Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. .... ...... <br />lq'J::; <br /> <br />Table 3 <br />DIVERSIONS MINUS MEASURED RETURNS <br />FOR MAJOR WATER USERS <br />LOWER COLORADO RIVER <br />1966 to 1970 <br />(Thousands of Acre-Feet) <br /> <br />Water r~8r <br />Clhfornia <br />Metropolitan Water <br />Dist. ........................ <br />Palo \'erde Irrig. <br />Dist. ........................ <br />Imperial Irrig. Dist. <br />Coachella \'alley Co. <br />Water Dist. <br />Yuma Project, <br />Reser\'. Di.... ... <br /> <br />1966 /96i 1968 1969 1970 <br />1,121 1,182 1,105 1,139 1,205 <br />384 365 387 386 384 <br />2,778 2,860 2,745 2,766 2,751 <br />484 453 469 490 448 <br />48 53 56 65 48 <br />4,815 4,911 4,762 4,846 4,836 <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />Deliveries to Mexico <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation maintains a <br />control schedule which includes the sche- <br />duled deliveries to Mexico plus releases from <br />storage for sluicing, river regulation, and <br />other purposes. The scheduled deliveries, <br />control schedule amounts, and excess deliv- <br />eries to Mexico for recent years are shown in <br />Table 4. <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />Table 4 <br />DELIVERIES TO MEXICO <br />COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM <br />(Thousands of Acre-Feet) <br /> <br />Water <br />Y~ar <br /> <br />Sch.dul.d <br />Deliv~ri~s <br />to Control <br />M~xit:O" Sch~u/~ <br /> <br />Flow to <br />M~xico <br /> <br />Exc~ss <br />Ddi~'~ri~s <br />ro <br />Mexico <br /> <br />Excess <br />Ov~r <br />Control <br />Sch~u/~ <br /> <br />Arizona <br />Colorado Ri.... <br />Indian Reser.... ........ <br />Gila Project ................ <br />Yuma Project, <br />\'alley Di.... <br /> <br /> 1962 .... 1,500 1,540 1,763 263 223 <br /> 1963 ......... 1,500 1,873 2,113 613 240 <br /> 1964 .......... 1,500 1,549 1,776 276 227 <br />186 200 237 214 224 1965 ....... 1,474 1,502 1,594 120 92 <br />555 566 559 613 614 1966 .......... 1,541 1,632 1,720 179 88 <br /> 1967 ........ 1,459 1,517 1,566 107 49 <br />162 171 170 170 155 1968 .......... 1,488 1,541 1,563 75 22 <br /> 1969 .......... 1,491 1,545 1,551 59 6 <br />903 937 966 9'J7 9'J3 1970 .......... 1,476 1,528 1,566 90 38 <br /> <br />Total....... <br /> <br />Nevada <br />Pumping from Lake <br />Mead ................. <br /> <br />25 27 31 34 41 <br /> <br />Grand Total <br /> <br />5,743 5,875 5,759 5,877 5,870 <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation releases water <br />from storage at Hoover Dam to satisfy re- <br />quirements for the Mexican Water treaty and <br />for the Colorado River contractors. One of <br />the major operating problems is to meet all <br />water demands with minimum waste. Most <br />of the Colorado River contractors are served <br />by diversions at Imperial Dam, The nearest <br />major regulating structure to Imperial Dam <br />is Parker Dam, located 148 miles upstream <br />and three days' flow time from Imperial <br />Dam. The ordered flow at Imperial Dam is <br />seldom the precise rate actually required be- <br />cause of changes in the weather and other <br />factors during the travel time from Parker <br />Dam. Senator Wash Dam, completed in 1966 <br />on a tributary upstream from Imperial Dam, <br />provides for a limited amount of additional <br />storage which is used to balance river flows <br />with demands. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />. "I"he waler year lolal of scheduled deli\"eries IS not nece"~saril}' the 1,500,000 <br />acre-foot calendar year ubligatiun under the Mexican Water Tr~'y" <br /> <br />Plate 6 shows deliveries to Mexico during <br />1969-70. The extremely tight river control in <br />recent years can be seen by comparing the <br />total excess deliveries to Mexico with the <br />control schedule, as shown in Table 4. <br />The reductions in excess deliveries to Mex- <br />ico are attributed to improved river opera- <br />tion by the Bureau of Reclamation, to the <br />additional regulation afforded by Senator <br />Wash Reservoir, and cooperation on the part <br />of the water users by more stringent water <br />scheduling. Table 5 shows the Bureau of Rec- <br />lamation summary of records of deliveries <br />below Parker Dam for 1969-70. Of the 198,- <br />818 acre-feet of water ordered but not taken, <br />114,873 acre-feet was delivered to storage, 49,- <br />971 acre-feet was accepted by other users, and <br />33,974 acre-feet of the rejected water was <br />delivered to Mexico in excess of Treaty re- <br />quirements. California users ordered but did <br />not take about 2 percent of the total request- <br />ed diversions. The comparable figure for Ari- <br />zona users was about 7 percent. <br />