<br />. .... ......
<br />lq'J::;
<br />
<br />Table 3
<br />DIVERSIONS MINUS MEASURED RETURNS
<br />FOR MAJOR WATER USERS
<br />LOWER COLORADO RIVER
<br />1966 to 1970
<br />(Thousands of Acre-Feet)
<br />
<br />Water r~8r
<br />Clhfornia
<br />Metropolitan Water
<br />Dist. ........................
<br />Palo \'erde Irrig.
<br />Dist. ........................
<br />Imperial Irrig. Dist.
<br />Coachella \'alley Co.
<br />Water Dist.
<br />Yuma Project,
<br />Reser\'. Di.... ...
<br />
<br />1966 /96i 1968 1969 1970
<br />1,121 1,182 1,105 1,139 1,205
<br />384 365 387 386 384
<br />2,778 2,860 2,745 2,766 2,751
<br />484 453 469 490 448
<br />48 53 56 65 48
<br />4,815 4,911 4,762 4,846 4,836
<br />
<br />Total
<br />
<br />J
<br />
<br />Deliveries to Mexico
<br />
<br />The Bureau of Reclamation maintains a
<br />control schedule which includes the sche-
<br />duled deliveries to Mexico plus releases from
<br />storage for sluicing, river regulation, and
<br />other purposes. The scheduled deliveries,
<br />control schedule amounts, and excess deliv-
<br />eries to Mexico for recent years are shown in
<br />Table 4.
<br />
<br />r
<br />
<br />Table 4
<br />DELIVERIES TO MEXICO
<br />COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM
<br />(Thousands of Acre-Feet)
<br />
<br />Water
<br />Y~ar
<br />
<br />Sch.dul.d
<br />Deliv~ri~s
<br />to Control
<br />M~xit:O" Sch~u/~
<br />
<br />Flow to
<br />M~xico
<br />
<br />Exc~ss
<br />Ddi~'~ri~s
<br />ro
<br />Mexico
<br />
<br />Excess
<br />Ov~r
<br />Control
<br />Sch~u/~
<br />
<br />Arizona
<br />Colorado Ri....
<br />Indian Reser.... ........
<br />Gila Project ................
<br />Yuma Project,
<br />\'alley Di....
<br />
<br /> 1962 .... 1,500 1,540 1,763 263 223
<br /> 1963 ......... 1,500 1,873 2,113 613 240
<br /> 1964 .......... 1,500 1,549 1,776 276 227
<br />186 200 237 214 224 1965 ....... 1,474 1,502 1,594 120 92
<br />555 566 559 613 614 1966 .......... 1,541 1,632 1,720 179 88
<br /> 1967 ........ 1,459 1,517 1,566 107 49
<br />162 171 170 170 155 1968 .......... 1,488 1,541 1,563 75 22
<br /> 1969 .......... 1,491 1,545 1,551 59 6
<br />903 937 966 9'J7 9'J3 1970 .......... 1,476 1,528 1,566 90 38
<br />
<br />Total.......
<br />
<br />Nevada
<br />Pumping from Lake
<br />Mead .................
<br />
<br />25 27 31 34 41
<br />
<br />Grand Total
<br />
<br />5,743 5,875 5,759 5,877 5,870
<br />
<br />The Bureau of Reclamation releases water
<br />from storage at Hoover Dam to satisfy re-
<br />quirements for the Mexican Water treaty and
<br />for the Colorado River contractors. One of
<br />the major operating problems is to meet all
<br />water demands with minimum waste. Most
<br />of the Colorado River contractors are served
<br />by diversions at Imperial Dam, The nearest
<br />major regulating structure to Imperial Dam
<br />is Parker Dam, located 148 miles upstream
<br />and three days' flow time from Imperial
<br />Dam. The ordered flow at Imperial Dam is
<br />seldom the precise rate actually required be-
<br />cause of changes in the weather and other
<br />factors during the travel time from Parker
<br />Dam. Senator Wash Dam, completed in 1966
<br />on a tributary upstream from Imperial Dam,
<br />provides for a limited amount of additional
<br />storage which is used to balance river flows
<br />with demands.
<br />
<br />14
<br />
<br />. "I"he waler year lolal of scheduled deli\"eries IS not nece"~saril}' the 1,500,000
<br />acre-foot calendar year ubligatiun under the Mexican Water Tr~'y"
<br />
<br />Plate 6 shows deliveries to Mexico during
<br />1969-70. The extremely tight river control in
<br />recent years can be seen by comparing the
<br />total excess deliveries to Mexico with the
<br />control schedule, as shown in Table 4.
<br />The reductions in excess deliveries to Mex-
<br />ico are attributed to improved river opera-
<br />tion by the Bureau of Reclamation, to the
<br />additional regulation afforded by Senator
<br />Wash Reservoir, and cooperation on the part
<br />of the water users by more stringent water
<br />scheduling. Table 5 shows the Bureau of Rec-
<br />lamation summary of records of deliveries
<br />below Parker Dam for 1969-70. Of the 198,-
<br />818 acre-feet of water ordered but not taken,
<br />114,873 acre-feet was delivered to storage, 49,-
<br />971 acre-feet was accepted by other users, and
<br />33,974 acre-feet of the rejected water was
<br />delivered to Mexico in excess of Treaty re-
<br />quirements. California users ordered but did
<br />not take about 2 percent of the total request-
<br />ed diversions. The comparable figure for Ari-
<br />zona users was about 7 percent.
<br />
|