My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07313
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:26:45 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:15:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.114.J
Description
Dolores Participating Project
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
7/18/1975
Author
Mack/Lawrence - CSU
Title
Evaluation of Potential Irrigation on the Ute Mountain Ute Indian Reservation as Part of the Dolores Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. . <br />.5 hjgh as 10-11 millimhos within an 8 feet soil depth.. Sa\lnity is expected <br /> <br />:0 be a problem, particularly in the western part 'of the Dolores Project <br /> <br />~tlined for irrigation. The Dolores River water at Dolores contains <br />1.00 to 300 ppm dissolved solids 90% of the time according to the U.S. <br /> <br />G~logical Survey's Water Supply Papers. With additional soluble salt <br /> <br /> <br />~~cked up as the water flows in "the 42-mile Towaoc Canal, the irrigation <br /> <br /> <br />water may be classified as a medium salinity hazard by the time it <br /> <br /> <br />reaches the farm distribution systems, To reduce the salinity hazard <br /> <br /> <br />such that the drainage water has a quality characterized by an electrical <br /> <br /> <br />conductivity between. 5 and 10 millimhos needed by most of the crops in <br /> <br />)0 _ :'_ - _'~ . <br />the expected cropping pattern, a 4% to 8% leaching requirement must be <br />aflowed. . A 5% allowance is made in\this analysis because leaching efficiency <br />Under sprinkler irrigation is greater, relative to continuous flooding, which <br /> <br />is a common practice in many areas that require periodic leaching. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2.6 Net Irrigation Requirement <br />___The Technical Committee on Irrigation Water Requirements of the <br /> <br />Irrigation and Drainage Division of the American Society of Civil Engineers <br /> <br />recommends improvements in the procedure of estimating water requirements, <br /> <br />involving proper component consideration (Jensen, 1973). The following <br /> <br />analysis is based on the improved approach. <br /> <br /> <br />The ne~ irrigation requirement per"unit area is the water that must be <br /> <br /> <br />supplied"by irrigation to satisfy evapotranspiration, Et, leaching and <br /> <br />miscellaneous water requirements that are not provided by precipitation, <br /> <br />water stored in the soil, and precipitation that enters the soil. <br />Precipitation on wet soil that results in drainage in excess of leaching <br />. <br /> <br />is not effective. The present procedure for estimating net irrigation <br />requirement is given by: <br /> <br />":,:~ ; <br /> <br />.>' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.