My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07295
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07295
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:26:41 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:14:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.45.J
Description
Redlands Fish Ladder
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1998
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Final Environmental Assessment - Passageway Around the Redlands Diversion Dam
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Increased leaching of selenium into the watershed from agricultural practices may be impacting <br />fish and wildlife that use these waters. <br /> <br />Waterborne selenium concentrations of 2 parts per billion or greater should be considered <br />hazardous to the health and long-term survival of fIsh and wildlife populations due to the high <br />potential for food-chain bioaccumulation, dietary toxicity, and reproductive effects. In some <br />cases, trace amounts of selenium may lead to bioaccumulation and toxicity even when total <br />waterborne concentrations are less than 1 part per billion (Lemly, 1993). <br /> <br />Selenium concentrations in the Gunnison River downstream from Delta ranged from 4 to 10 <br />parts per billion in 1988. Currently, studies are being done to determine what effect will be <br />seen in native fish that use waters with high selenium concentrations. It is thought by some <br />researchers that native fIsh may have a higher tolerance for selenium than some other fish <br />species because they evolved in an area with higher background levels of selenium. <br /> <br />Other endangered or threatened species that have been confIrmed to use the Gunnison River or <br />its floodplain include the bald eagle (Haliaeerus leucocephalus), peregrine falcon (Falco <br />peregrinus), and possibly the whooping crane (Grus americana). The bald eagle is a fairly <br />common winter resident and historically nested in area river bottoms. Food sources in the area <br />include waterfowl, fish, rabbits, and carrion. The rivers are the primary focus of activities, <br />although the eagles do feed and roost away from the river occasionally. Sandhill cranes frequent <br />the Gunnison Basin during migration and experimentally introduced whooping cranes accompany <br />these migrations between Idaho and New Mexico. This introduction experiment has ended and <br />the whooping cranes in these flocks are not reproducing so their small numbers will gradually <br />disappear from the Gunnison Basin. The peregrine falcon nests in the Black Canyon of the <br />Gunnison National Monument and along the Colorado River downstream from the Gunnison <br />River confluence. <br /> <br />One endangered bird species-the southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidomox traillii exlimus)-- <br />and two birds that are candidates for listing--the black tern (Chlidonias niger) and the white- <br />faced ibis (Plegadis chilu)--are considered to possibly use the Gunnison River Basin. <br /> <br />An endangered plant, the clay-loving wild buckwheat (Eriogonum pelinophilum), and a <br />threatened plant, the Uinta Basin hookless cactus (Sclerocacrus glaucus) , occur in scattered <br />desert uplands in the Gunnison Basin. The Brandegee milk-vetch (Astragalus brandegel), a <br />candidate plant species occurs in the upper Gunnison Valley in Gunnison County. <br /> <br />Impacts <br /> <br />The historical range of endangered fish. species in the Colorado River Basin has been fragmented <br />by construction of dams and diversions that serve as barriers to fish movement. Under the No <br />Action Alternative, this condition would continue on the Gunnison River unless a fish <br />passageway was constructed under another program. Under No Action a self-sustaining <br />population of endangered fish would be less likely to develop in the Gunnison River. Under No <br /> <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.