My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07287
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07287
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:26:39 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:14:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.200
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - Development and History - UCRB 13a Assessment
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/1/1979
Title
UCRB Region Section 13a Assessment - Technical Report - The Availability of Water for Oil Shale and Coal Gasification Development in the Upper Colorado River basin - revised draft - June 1979
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />;>:{.> <br />~.~,~~ <br />.~~:;. <br /> <br />can also be seen in figure 3.1, which shows estimated natural flows for <br />the Colorado River at Lees Ferry, Arizona. 1 <br /> <br />f\~ <br />~ Given this annual variability in runoff conditions, the period of <br />~ record which one chooses when performing hydrologic analyses becomes <br />~ critical. For example, figure 3.2 shows the different estimates of natu- <br />ral flow at Lees Ferry which are arrived at by selecting different periods. <br />The most notable observation is that the long-term annual average is re- <br />duced by better than one million acre-feet when the extremely wet period <br />from 1906 through the 1920s is not taken into account. Furthermore, there <br />obviously have been shorter periods when the estimated average annual <br />natural flow was substantially below any longer term average. <br /> <br />For the purposes of this report, the period 1906-1974 has been used <br />as the primary basis of analysis. In selected instances, the period 1930- <br />1974 (with average annual natural flows estimated at 13.8 million acre- <br />feet) has also been used for comparison purposes (see chapter 9). In all <br />events, it is imperative that the reader remember that the period selected <br />has a significant effect on the outcome of the analysis. Furthermore, of <br />course, regulation of inflows has a profound effect on any hydrologic re- <br />gime, and this fact must also be taken into account. <br /> <br />.'... <br />:~,':-:.: <br /><";:.: <br /> <br />The second salient characteristic of runoff conditions in the Upper <br />Basin is the monthly variation which occurs during anyone year. As can <br />be seen in figure 3.3, runoff peaks during a four-month period, ..with <br />about 65 to 75 percent of the annual runoff arising, on the average, <br />during those months.2 This distribution of monthly flows is, of course, <br />the result of snowmelt, which constitutes the primary source of runoff in <br />the Basin. <br /> <br />1. "Lees Ferry" is the name of the U. S. Geological Survey gauging station <br />located on the Colorado River upstream from the town of Lees Ferry and <br />above the confluence of the Paria River with the Colorado. "Lee Ferry" <br />is the point on the Colorado River one mile below the mouth of the Paria <br />which serves as the point of demarcation between the Upper and Lower <br />Colorado River Basins for the purposes of the 1922 Colorado River Compact. <br />As used in this report, "Lees Ferry" means the gauging station, while the <br />phrase "compact point" will be used to refer to "Lee Ferry." <br /> <br />2. In making the natural flow estimates, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation <br />did not, in all instances, take into account the lag effect of irrigation <br />return flows on gauged stream records. Thus, the monthly distribution <br />of natural flows shows peak month flows that are slightly lower than <br />would be the case if the lag effect had been taken into account. Like- <br />wise, late summer and early fall natural flows are slightly overestimated. <br />In both instances, the error is thought to be insignificant. <br /> <br />.>:, ~. <br /> <br />:.: <br /> <br />3-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.