Laserfiche WebLink
<br />10. BECAUSE THE RECOVERY PLAN IS IN PLACE <br />AND BEING IMPLEMENTED, SIMPLE DEPLETION <br />OF WATER BY A WATER PROJECT WILL NOT <br />JEOPARDIZE THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE OF <br />ENDANGERED FISH SPECIES. <br /> <br />11. PROJECTS HAVING DIRECT IMPACTS ON <br />ENDANGERED SPECIES WOULD BE REQUIRED <br />TO MITIGATE IMPACTS UNDER SECTION 7. <br /> <br />12. PROJECTS FOUND TO BE JEOPARDIZING THE <br />CONTINUED EXISTENCE OF ENDANGERED SPECIES <br />AS A RESULT OF DIRECT IMPACTS InLL BE <br />PROVIDED THE OPPORTUNITY TO SUGGEST <br />REASONABLE AND PRUDENT ALTERNATIVES AS <br />MITIGATION MEASURES. NULLIFYING THE LAWFUL <br />WATER RIGHTS OF A PROJECT PROPONENT IS NOT <br />A REASONABLE OR PRUDENT ALTERNATIVE. <br />