Laserfiche WebLink
<br />602',54 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S MONTHLY REPORT <br />TO THE <br />COLORADO RIVER BOARD OF eALIFORNIA <br /> <br />....,~~.......-n <br />,,~~t.=.';Jt::.t '\1 ~f.J <br /> <br />OCT 1 9 1998 <br /> <br />October 13, 1998 <br /> <br />Colo~ad:l Wa::cr <br />Conservation Board <br /> <br />ADMINlSTRA nON <br /> <br />Revised 1998 Board Meetin~ Schedule <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />lncluded in the Board folder is a revised meeting schedule, dated October 5, 1998, for the <br />remainder of the 1998 calendar year. The schedule was updated to reflect the changes in the date <br />and location of the November Board meeting and the cancellation of the September Board meeting. <br /> <br />PROTECTION OF EXISTING RIGHTS <br /> <br />CO,""''',, River WIJUJr Reoort <br /> <br />During August 1998, storage in the major Upper Basin reservoirs decreased by 763,000 <br />acre-feet lIIId storage in the Lower Basin reservoirs increased by 311,000 acre-feet. Total System <br />active storage at the end of August was 56.389 million acre-feet (mat) or 95 pcrcent of capacity, <br />which is 1.370 mafmore than one year ago. <br /> <br />September releases from Hoover, Davis, and Parker Dams averaged 16,170, 15,360 and <br />13,730 cubic feet per second (cfs), respectively. Planned releases from those three dams for the <br />month of October are 11,000, 12,500 and 11,000 cfs, respectively. The October releases represent <br />those needed to meet downstream water requirements plus those for flood control space building. <br /> <br />The actual April through July 1998 unregulated inflow into Lake Powell was 8.625 mar, <br />which is 112 pen::ent of the 30-year average for the period 1961-1990. The unregulated inflow into <br />Lake Powell for the 1997-98 water year was 13.660 mar. or 117 percent of the 30-year average. <br /> <br />The Lower Division states' estimAted conswnptive use of Colorado River water for calendar <br />year 1998, as estimated by Board staffon October]'1', totals 7.996 mafand is projected as follows: <br />Arizona, 2.753 mar; California, 4.997 maf; and, Nevada, 0.246 mar. EstimAted additional <br />unmeasured return flow credits of 0.247 mar would reduce the total amount to 7.749 mat: For <br />calendar year 1998, the Central Arizona Project (CAP) is projected to divert 1.389 mar and The <br />MetrOpolitan Water District of South em California (MWD) is projected to divert 1.092 mar. <br /> <br />The preliminary October I" forecast of 1998 end-of-year California agricultural conswnptive <br />use of Colorado River water under the first three priorities of the 1931 California Seven Party <br />Agreement is 3.846 maf. This estimate is based on the collective use through September 1998 by <br />the Palo Verde Irrigation District (PVID), the Yuma Project Reservation Division (VPRD), the <br />Imperial Irrigation District (lID), and the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). Figure I, found <br />at the end of this report, depicts the forecast of end-of-year agricultural use for the year. <br />