Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />position statements from various State and Federal agencies on certain <br /> <br />of the plans, was heavily considered during the planning team's eval- <br /> <br />uation process. The evaluation process considered each plan on a <br />l\j <br />l\j technical, economic, social/environmental, and institutional basis, and <br />c,:; <br /><0 seven were identified as feasible replacement source alternatives. <br /> <br />They included (1) canal lining, (2) desalting ocean water, (3) a <br />desalting plant in the Imperial Valley, (4) geothermal resource develop- <br />ment, (5) ground-water withdrawal, (6) ground-water pumping along <br />the All-American Canal, and (7) high recovery at the Yuma Desalting <br /> <br />Plant. These seven alternatives, then, along with others that may be <br />identified as the study progresses, will be considered during the <br />feasibility investigation. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />iv <br />