Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0G <br /> <br />MR. CARPENTER: Why don't you strike 'through'? <br /> <br />". <br /> <br />MR. DAVIS: It weakens the sentenoe:, put in the last three <br /> <br />'1ines, whioh it'seems to me are out ofplaoe. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />As a matter of <br />, , <br /> <br />arrangement th~y oould go in before the Ufurther equitable appor- <br />tionment.1f <br /> <br />, . <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: uTo establish the relative importanoe of the <br />different beneficial uses of water and to, make provision for <br />settlement of future controversies among the seven states signatory <br />tb this compaot in order to promote interstate oomity, eto.u <br />MR. NORVIEL:An apportionment of the waters to eaoh of them. <br /> <br />MR. HAMELE: A portion. of the water ,: or portions of water. <br />MR. HOOVER: An assignment of a portion, or' something like <br />that,. why not say 'apportionment'. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />MR. DAVIS: Theimplioation being we are ;apportionin,g all, <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />when we 'are not. <br /> <br />MR. HAMED];: The word' unapp.ropriated" might be, oha~ged to <br /> <br />'unapportioned.' <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: Can we pass this now? <br /> <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: I hadn't seen this ml;l.tter until now, but it <br /> <br /> <br />looks fairly well, but I would like to .haive ,a ohaooe to reaoh it <br /> <br />over. <br /> <br />MR.' CARPENTER: <br /> <br />I will kick on Uto this endlf. <br />. ' '.. <br /> <br />MR. NORVIEL: <br /> <br />I think the word uunappropriatedlf shoulo. be <br /> <br />left there; it means what is inteno.ed. <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: <br />MR. DAVIS: <br />',,.' <br />MR~ HOOVER: <br />MR. EMERSON: <br /> <br />Unappropriated or unapportioned. <br />, <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />I will vote for either. <br /> <br />IfI <br /> <br />It will be unappropri.ated., <br /> <br />It might meansomethi~g -we;have a definition <br />for lfunappropriateo..1f <br />