Laserfiche WebLink
<br />69 <br /> <br />MIL NOINIEL: Not in this sort of compact; we will have to <br /> <br />have it; that's the reason I got away from this sort of definition. <br /> <br />(:j <br /> <br />MR., Dl,VIS: Your objection now goes to the entire compact? <br /> <br /> <br />MR. Cl"WE;NTEtl: I don't think that's fair to Mr. Norviel. <br /> <br />Mil. HOOVEH: Can we take it then California o.nd'l,rizono..would <br /> <br />agree to thi s if we leave out tJ;lC words "by the two governmont s, II <br /> <br />so it would read liThe burden of supplying water of the Colorado, <br /> <br /> <br />River System from the United Statos of America to the United States <br /> <br />of Mexico in fulfillment of obligations, if any, which may be <br />established, shall be equally apportioned between and equally <br />borne by the upper and lower bo.sin.1I Would you approve of it <br /> <br />that wo.y. <br /> MH. NOINIEL: I would. <br /> MH. MC C LUHE : I would. <br /> MH. HOOVEH: How does tho.t strike the rest of you? <br /> <br />One <br /> <br />gives an opportunity for 0. court determination presumably" o.nd tho <br />other involves 0. treo.ty. <br />Mil. Cl,LDWELL: Mo.y not leo.ving out those words some time <br />meo.n that private individuals, :rego.rdless of the government might <br />demand rights on certo.in ground's. It seems to me importa:nt that <br /> <br />final adjudico.tion of these rights in toto should be by the <br /> <br />governments. <br /> <br />MH. EMERSON: They would ~ave to establish their rights to <br /> <br />the court. <br /> <br />MH. CLJ;DW~LL: ~he final adjudication should be between the <br /> <br />two no.tions. <br /> <br />MR. HOOVEH: In the firstplo.ce, the court determination <br /> <br />would likely be less than o.n international treaty, and second, if <br />I <br />I <br />