Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.' <br /> <br />-~~t. <br />Basalt Proj ect '%:'~Jbntinued) <br /> <br />,",f" <br />, <br /> <br />printed as House Document No. 353, 86th Congress, 2d Session. Other <br />appendices to that report which are related to the Ruedi Reservoir include <br />reports by the Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wild- <br />life, and National Park Service, and two reports made for the Colorado <br />Water Conservation Board on possible water requirements associated with <br />potential oil shale developments near the Colorado River below the Ruedi <br />Reservoir site. <br /> <br />A reconnaissance report on the pruject was published in December 1962 <br />entitled "Huedi-Western Slope Investigations." <br /> <br />Status of Planning <br /> <br />The project feasibility investigations were initiated in May 1967. <br /> <br />Plan formulation studies, designs, and estimates for all project features, <br />agricultural studies, and economic studies have been completed, and writing <br />of the proposed feasibility report has been initiated. Work has been <br />initiated on the environmental studies and preparation of the Draft En- <br />vironmental Impact Statement. The proposed feasibility report is sched- <br />uled to be completed later this fiscal year. <br /> <br />Total investigation costs to June 30, 1972, inclUding appraisal (recon- <br />naissance) and feasibility, amount to $600,047. <br /> <br />Plan of Development <br /> <br />Water would be made available by storage releases from the existing Ruedi <br />Reservoir, a feature of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Proj ect, on the Fryingpan <br />Hi ver and from development of surplus flows of Ca:tt1e. Creek and from <br />water exchanges along Mesa and Coulter Creeks. The storage water would <br />be conveyed from the reservoir to municipal and domestic treatment plants <br />and the Landis Canal by the Landis Pipeline and Canal. The treated water <br />would be distributed by three separate municipal and domestic trunklines <br />to the Roaring Fork Valley between the town of Carbondale and a point <br />upstream about midway between the towns of Aspen and Basalt. <br /> <br />Two municipal and domestic trunklines would branch from a treatment plant <br />about 1 mile north of Basalt. The Snowma.ss trunldine would distribute <br />municipal and domestic water to the Roaring Fork Valley between Basalt <br />and a point upstream about midway between the towns of Basalt and Aspen. <br />The El Jebel trunkline would distribute the treated water to the town of <br />Basalt and downstream to ,a point about midway betll'een the towns of Basalt <br />and Carbondale. The third trunkline, Carbondale, would begin at a treat- <br />ment plant at the terminus of the Landis Pipeline Wid distribute municipal <br />and domestic water to the lower half of the Roaring Fork Valley including <br />Carbondale and to the elevated mesas between Cattl~ Creek and the Roaring <br />Fork River. <br /> <br />The Landis Canal would convey domestic and normal irrigation water to <br />the elevated terraces and valleys north of the Roaring Fork River between <br /> <br />2 <br />