My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07217
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07217
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:26:18 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:12:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/26/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission on Compact Negotiations - Meeting #1
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />36 <br /> <br />36 <br /> <br />judgment that this Hould be the time to h~ar the presentation of any <br /> <br />municipal or private interests, That may! be wrong but that was my.. <br /> <br />judgment, <br /> <br />Mr. Scrugham. I think it is desirab~e to call attention to Hhat <br /> <br />Hr. Davis has brought out in his ~tatemen~; that the plan adopted <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />need not necessarily contain any restrict~on~ upon local development~. <br />! <br />Hr. Davis. That i~ correct within t~eBa~in; the pos~ibilities <br /> <br />of taking water outside of the Basin are ~ot included. I think they <br /> <br />are ~mall at the present time, and they are so indefinite that no <br /> <br />final statement on that point can be made! at the present time, <br /> <br /> <br />Hr. Scrugham, If this.view is correct, it undoubtedly simplifies <br /> <br />i <br />our problem. Hm./ever, in order to properly finance projects, they. <br /> <br />must have a very definite assurance of adequate Hater supply. <br /> <br />Mr. Carpenter. I have proceeded .on~he assumption that such was <br /> <br /> <br />the condition and that will undoubtedly s~mplify our Hork. <br /> <br />, <br />Mr. Caldwell, I understood this Horf applied particularly to <br />i <br />irrigation and did not necessarily include pOHer in the same scope? <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Davis. No; the possibilities or. the facts connected with <br />i <br />that are such that so long as the Hater is not taken out of the Basin, <br />. I.' <br />i <br />the development of the power would not in~erfere with the use of the <br />. , <br /> <br />same HatEir for irri~ation in the Northernl Basin--that is the total of <br />. i <br />the pm'ler in the Upper Basin^ There is t~e .possibility of manipulat- <br /> <br />. . <br />.. . <br />. . <br />ing . the 'later in the Northern Basin that power development might there <br />. , . I <br />interfere with irrigation development, bu~ the statement I made there <br />. '! <br />Has that the possibilities of irrigation hevelopment can be all com- <br />. . , <br />i <br />plied with with the water supply properlyl conserved and also power <br />, <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />41 <br /> <br />development can be carried out^ At the same time the possibility of <br />. I <br />interfering with irrigation by pOHer deve~opment throughout the Canyon <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.