Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1583 <br />Maintaining srable water levels from mid August <br />ro November lends stability ro the reservoir, fut- <br />rhet enhancing productivity. <br /> <br />2. Water Preferences For Riparian Habitats <br /> <br />a. Arkansas River <br />Riparian and wetland resources in the srudy reach <br />are largely modified. A century of road and rail- <br />way consrrucrion, dams, irrigarion developmenr. <br />conversion of/and to agricultute, residential <br />development, and othet modifications have influ- <br />enced the riparian resources present today. <br />Modifications are genetally centered around: <br /> <br />. Vegetation manipulation -: land use activities <br />such as recreation and grazing, introduction <br />and invasion of exotic vegetation, selective har- <br />vesting of certain riparian species. etc. <br /> <br />. Watershed alter:uion - land use activities such <br />as roads, logging, agriculrure. mining. and <br />urbanization that affect facrors such as inftlrra- <br />tion, runoff, sediment supply, and water <br />quality. <br /> <br />. Direct modification -- channelization. drain. <br />ing, filling, conversion to other uses, ere. <br /> <br />. Hydrology alteration - water diversions. water <br />imporrarions, storage, etc. <br /> <br />Capability and potential of most tiparian and <br />wetland resources within me study area is deter- <br />mined a gteat deal by the natural shape and form <br />of the tivet corridor that is cteated by geology of <br />the area. Much of rhe Arkansas River is bounded <br />by rock, is narrow, and confined due ro the deep <br />canyon landform. Many reaches which were con- <br />fined narurally are now even more confined <br />because of railway and highway construction. The <br />canyon serring, coupled with high flows, limits <br />soil development and plant rooting abilities. <br />However, some reaches are less confined, and <br />have meander bars and streamside margins with a <br />limited band of riparian vegetarion. Downstream <br />of Canon City, and the shorr reach between <br />Leadville and Granite, have well-developed flood- <br />plains wirh substantial riparian and werland vege- <br />tation. The majority of rhe riparian and werland <br />vegetation is composed of grasses-sedge-rush, wil- <br /> <br />lows (several species), alders, bitch, and COtron- <br />wood. <br /> <br />Rarher rhan quantifYing the exact changes ro be <br />expeered from flow alterations, the focus of this <br />water needs assessment was co review the litera. <br />rure related (Q riparian communities and identify <br />general rdationships and effects that river man- <br />agers should keep in mind while managing flows. <br />Determining the exact impact of either or large or <br />small scale flow alterations on Arkansas River <br />riparian communities would require an exhaus- <br />rive, long-term study rhat is bevond rhe scope of <br />the present Water Needs r\.ssessmenr. <br /> <br />The unique serring of each riparian area along rhe <br />river. in terms of geomorphology. groundw~l[er <br />levels, and gainingllosing stream teaches. also <br />makes it difficult ro predict the effects of flow <br />modification without intensive local study. For <br />example, in rhe Brown's Canvon reach. each lOO <br />cfs increase in Hows increases me Water surface <br />elevation by 3% ro 5%, while in rhe Floodplain <br />sjre, the jncreased water surface elevation is less <br />because of the broader channel. However, the <br />impact from a 100 cfs increase in flows on vegeta- <br />rian will be greater in the Floodplain site, because <br />rhe vegetation line at Floodplain is closer in eleva- <br />tion co me mean annual water surface elevJ.cion. <br /> <br />There are rhree facrors which are rhe most critical <br />in maintenance of riparian habitats: (I) maintain- <br />ing rhe hisrotic ftequency and duration of floods, <br />(2) maintaining growing se:l.Son groundwater lev- <br />els in areas adjacent to the srream, and (3) main- <br />taining the annual and seasonal variation in the <br />hydtograph. <br /> <br />The riparian community is a product of the long- <br />term hydrolog:.' of rhe river. so fairly large vatia- <br />rions in flow for one year will likely not have a <br />significant effeer. Consistently higher or lower <br />flows, however. willlikelv alter rhe extent and <br />location of riparian vegeracion. The outcome of <br />Row manipulation is more likely ro be the evolu- <br />cion of:J. new riparian J.rea which is a different <br />widrh and elevacion, rather rhan elimination, <br />enhancement, or large changes in rhe ovetall <br />acreage of the riparian community. <br /> <br />31 <br />