Laserfiche WebLink
<br />However it is evident that apparent losses accompanying increased <br />inflow are temporary losses. in part, and finally result in gains after chan- <br />nel conditions are satisfied. This effect of temporary channel storage has <br />not been given due credit by the Irrigation Administration. who are inclined <br />to blame the old wide channel for excessive losses without allowing for gains <br />from channel storage. <br /> <br />Our graphs of water disposal analysis show a close synchronization of <br />fluctuations with losses and gains; which is another proof of the necessity <br />for furnishing and maintaining sui table water supplies for channel require- <br />ments and natural ground water demands. thereby obviating the necessity fBr <br />trying to meet excessive demands after it is too late and after the available <br />supplies have been taken by Juniors. out-of -priori ty and not in accordance <br />with proper delivery schedules. <br /> <br />When mistakes like those of 1937 were made by allowing all upstream <br />canals to take full appropriations and when Kearney was deprived of its prior <br />appropriation; then. acting officials attempted to make explanations which <br />did not satisfy the victims of such administration mistakes. <br /> <br />The first delivery of Sutherland Storage waters in 1936 made a <br />remarkable test run. when it started with a dry bed and kept' up diversions <br />and reasonable losses, until the return channel storage finally registered <br />substantial gains near the end of the run. This is still another proof of <br />our previous claims. <br /> <br />Evidence from lay witnesses was in good conformity with hydrographs <br />of river flow over a long period of years to the effect that years ago the <br />low water shortage came later than it does now. and then the supply of early <br />autumn was better than now experienced. Which conditions were favorable to <br />farmers of the lOwer valley who are now suffering from shortage of water all <br />summer. <br /> <br />The expert geological and ground water testimony was significant in <br />proving our claims of small losses west of Kearney compared with large losses <br />East of Kearney. It also showed conspicuously that the North and South <br />Platte Valleys are "tight" and do not lose water by deep-percolation or seep- <br />age under natural conditions. Channel depletion comes from diversions of <br />Junior appropriators. <br /> <br />Certain predictions by R. I. Meeker for future flow of the Platte <br />river east of North Platte were based upon seepage from canals and reservoirs <br />and power house waste or tail water which are predicted to make a continuous <br />flow at all times. However. (if the prediction comes true) in the meantime <br />it is urgently necessary to maintain established delivery schedules in <br />accordance with legal priorities: hoping of course that more desirable <br />channel conditions and possible adjustments will contribute beneficially. <br />Nevertheless we must face the facts concerning depletion of water supplies <br />previously noted. . <br /> <br />r'9fr <br /> <br />- 2 - <br />