My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07180
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07180
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:07:05 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:09:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8043
Description
Section D General Studies-Salinity
State
CO
Date
6/1/1971
Author
WaterPowerResources
Title
Improving Municipal Water Supplies in Colorado by Desalting
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Section 1 <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />This study examined the technical and economic feasibility of applying <br />desalting technology to the problem of improving municipal water supplies for <br />six selected communities in Colorado. The six communities, in their order of <br />size J are La Junta, Lamar, Brighton, Ft. Morgan, Las Animas J and Ft. Lupton-. <br />The water quality goal established for this study was to produce potable water <br />with a total hardness below 200 mg/l, with total dissolved solids less than <br />1000 mg/l, and no United states Public Health Service (USPHS) rejection stan- <br />dards exceeded. <br /> <br />Preliminary estimates of desalting costs and benefits were made for each <br />of the candidate communities. The Office of Saline Water "Desalting Cost Cal- <br />culating Procedures" manual (OSW Il&D No. 555) was used to estimate the cost of <br />desalting for each of the systems considered for application. Generally, the <br />membrane processes (electrodialysis and reverse osmosis) appear to provide the <br />best desalting cost economics for these communities. A potential improvement <br />in the cost of applying membrane desalting plants appears possible through <br />coupling to ion-exchange equipment for the removal of hardness ions prior to <br />further desalination. Such coupled systems appear attractive for providing sig- <br />nificantly increased product water yield with accompanying reduction in brine <br />volumes and their associated disposal costs. A preliminary cost estimate was <br />made for an all ion-eXChange system for treatment of the feedwater for one of <br />the communities (La Junta). The results indicate unit water costs somewhat low- <br />er than for any of the other processes considered. In summary, it is feasible <br />to desalt the available feedwater for each candidate community to the target <br />quality goal by the application of one or more of the processes considered. <br />The specific process yielding the indicated lowest unit cost of water is strong- <br />ly dependent on the specific composition and degree of salinity of the feed- <br />. water. Water costs for the candidate communities, including feedwater supply, <br />desalting processing, product water distribution and brine disposal range from <br />a low of 63 cents per 1000 gallons to a high of 119 cents per 1000 gallons. <br /> <br />The economic feasibility of desalting hinges upon the economic impact of <br />the improved water on the subject communities. The economic impact for any <br />community is derived from the quantifiable ben~fits to the community over a <br />20-year period. Benefits in any single year are calculated based on the dif- <br />ferences in overall expenditures in the community for the cases with and with- <br />out improved water. Computed benefits for the year 1970 in the cities studied <br />ranged from $100,800 to $464,800, while 1990 benefits were from $158,000 to <br />$647,300. <br /> <br />It should be pointed out that the benefits itemized here reflect only the <br />tangible benefits resulting from desalting. Intangible benefits accruing to <br />these communities as a result of improved water include quality of life, en- <br />vironmental, and economic development benefits. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />0201 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.