Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Section 5 <br />DESALTING TECHNOLOGY CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />In order to meet the objective of determining the best desalting technique <br />to use for each community, it has been necessary to evaluate a number of dif- <br />ferent candidate desalting systems. The various candidate systems were analyz- <br />ed to verify the technical feasibility of their use and to establish which sys- <br />tem results in the lowest cost for product water in each city. System costs <br />for the various techniques were derived using the Office of Saline Water manual <br />of procedures for calculating costs.* <br /> <br />CANDIDATE DESALTING TECHNIQUES <br /> <br />In this study, primary consideration has been given to those desalting <br />techniques which are currently considered the most economically favorable and <br />which are desirable due to the feedwater qualities and plant capacities in- <br />volved. Distillation processes were not examined in depth since they are most <br />economical for systems with large plant capacities (much larger than the capa- <br />cities required for the selected communities) and for feedwater with very large <br />concentrations of total dissolved solids (up to 50,000 mg/l). The desalting <br />techniques examined in most det~il were electrodialysis, reverse osmosis, and <br />vacuum-freezing vapor-compression. <br /> <br />A review of the water quality information for the communities of interest <br />reveals that all of the cities have fairly high calcium and sulfate concentra- <br />tions, expecially Las Animas. This fact is critical for distillation and mem- <br />brane desalting techniques since special measures are needed to prevent calcium <br />sulfate precipitation which will foul heat transfer surfaces in the case of <br />distillation and membrane surfaces in the case of electrodialysis or reverse <br />osmosis systems. Pretreatment of the feedwater by simple chemical addition <br />I can alleviate this problem within limits. Where calcium concentrations are be- <br />yond the limits of such pretreatments, two methods of avoiding scale formation <br />are still possible. One method is to operate the system at low brine concentra- <br />tion rates to avoid exceeding calcium sulfate solubility limits. The other me- <br />thod is to lower feedwater calcium sulfate concentration by using an ion-ex- <br />change pretreatment. The Office of Saline Water contracted separately with <br />Bresler and Associates of .New York, New York to assist the Ken R. White Company <br />and URS Research Company in examining the second method. Results of work per- <br />formed by Bresler and Associates are included as Appendix A of this report. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Desalting Cost Calculating Procedures, U.S. Department of the Interior, Of- <br />fice of Saline Water, Research and Development Progress Report No. 555. <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />~\~\) <br />