|
<br />reflect relationships detemiined feasil;>le'by,
<br />the Framework Plan. Specific changes should
<br />include recognition of such relationship and
<br />provide for feasible int~rbasinwater transfers
<br />and solutions to area problems not confined to
<br />one river basin. The sequence of revision of
<br />completed Reports and the preparation of rue
<br />ture Basin Reports w.ould pe.b~sed:on:.~I1~i.I.:
<br />relationship and the 'findings of the statewide
<br />Framework Plan.
<br />
<br />5.', A plan 6fdev'eloprtient forthosehasins -'
<br />limited by resource or loc~ti.or fio,m.,
<br />participating in any statewide water
<br />balancing scheme should be prepared as pre-
<br />viously scheduled:
<br />
<br />STATUS SUMMARY
<br />
<br />The Status Summary prepared during the
<br />first planning period by its nature'reql,lires
<br />periodic updating. It is recommended that:
<br />
<br />6 The Status Summary be completed and
<br />updated biennially in 'order' that 'the
<br />· Legislature will have available current
<br />information for its consideration.
<br />
<br />SPECIAL RECOMMENDATIONS
<br />
<br />The Special Recommendation~ portion of
<br />the State Water Plan should continue to deal .
<br />with the many remaining topics of vitalim-
<br />
<br />,,",l
<br />
<br />'\ ...
<br />
<br />, "
<br />
<br />',. '.
<br />
<br />\,'
<br />
<br />" '
<br />" '
<br />portance to Nebtaska~'s resourte development:
<br />", In particular, it is recommended that; '. '
<br />
<br />7.
<br />
<br />Future recommendations should study
<br />: ways of accelerating implementation of
<br />,:the plarming wo~k do~e t~ date. '
<br />
<br />.'~ .' .
<br />8 An ii1te~im study coinmittee on ~l:lter '
<br />..,' .:should be'appoirited by:theLeg'lslature:
<br />to, select particular topics for:'study.
<br />which would ,be of greatest interest and v'alue
<br />, to theL~gislature, c, '
<br />, , '.," J,
<br />
<br />,.,r
<br />
<br />SUMMARY'
<br />
<br />. "
<br />, ,
<br />
<br />The guid~nceof. th~Legislature as to the'
<br />" post 1971 planning work by accepting or mak-
<br />ing ,alternaterecorQmendations of studies will
<br />be oJ great assistance i~ illiowing the Commis-
<br />sion to, proceed with f~ture planning in an
<br />orderly fashion. The Commission's early start
<br />.Jill in turn assist'thestate'and federal agencies
<br />who are cooperating in the development of
<br />this Plan:soasthey can properly budget both'
<br />,time and manpower required in carryin'g out
<br />their, responsibilities.
<br />
<br />SPECIFIC LEGISLATIVE DIRECTION,'
<br />EITHER ENDORSING 'RECOMMENDA-
<br />TIONS ~ONTAINED HEREIN ORSET~
<br />TING OUT OTHER PLANNING GOALS IS
<br />, ' ,
<br />REQUEST~D BY THE NEBRASKA SOIL
<br />'AND ,WATER CONSERVATION CO~MIS-
<br />SION.
<br />
<br />.'....
<br />
<br />" ,.
<br />
<br />.... .' :",.. "...,-1 .....1-0.
<br />
<br />'. -, ," . h '.. "t.' .._n
<br />
<br />... ,
<br />
<br />; ,
<br />
<br />.". .
<br />
<br />" C",
<br />
<br />22
<br />
<br />.1," ," ," ',\:.
<br />
|