My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07149
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:58 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:06:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.765
Description
White River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
3/1/1994
Author
USFS
Title
Snowmass Ski Area - Record of Decision - Final Environmental Impact Statement - White River National Forest - Aspen Ranger District
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OOr~n <br /> <br />Table 4: Major Permits That May Be Required and Issuing Authorities <br /> <br />Issuilll! Authoritv <br /> <br />Tvoe of Permit <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />FEDERAL <br />. Army Corps of Engineers <br /> <br />Clean Water Act. Section 404 permits <br />Water Diversions <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />STATE <br />. Air Pollution Control Division <br /> <br />Air emission permits <br /> <br />. Water Quality Control Division <br /> <br />Pollution Discharge Elimination <br />System (NPDES) pennits <br /> <br />Section 401 compliance certifications <br /> <br />Stormwater permits <br /> <br />. State Engineer's Office <br /> <br />Water storage pennits <br /> <br />. State Tramway Safety Board <br /> <br />Variances for non-compliance with <br />minimum lift clearance requirements <br /> <br />LOCAL <br />. Town of Snowmass Village <br /> <br />Building/zoning permits <br /> <br />. Pitkin County <br /> <br />Food and beverage licenses <br /> <br />3, Phasing of MDP Implementation <br /> <br />The useful life of the MOP authorized by this Decision is expected to be seven <br />to ten years, which means that components will be phased in over a long period <br />of time. The FEIS disclosure of impacts was primarily based on predicted effects <br />at the end of the implementation period, when all components were in place and <br />utilization is at peak levels. It is important to note that actual impacts will <br />not likely approach those disclosed in the FEIS because mitigation measures will <br />be implemented as each phase of development occurs. This is particularly the <br />case with potential transportation and air quality impacts which were based on <br />scenarios of worst possible conditions. <br /> <br />The Forest Service will work closely with local agencies to ensure that <br />recommended mitigation measures to mitigate both on-site and off-site impacts are <br />not out of sequence with MOP implementation. <br /> <br />I generally agree with the phasing plan proposed by ASC which designates the new <br />snowmaking system and East Village pod as the highest priority for <br />implementation. I believe these actions address serious shortcomings in current <br />ski area operations. <br /> <br />The Mitigation and Monitoring Plan stipulates that specified measures are to be <br />kept current, The progression of development and/or operations will not occur <br />unless mitigation and monitoring are current; erosion control and revegetation <br />are prime examples of actions that cannot be delayed. <br /> <br />RECORD OF DECISION <br /> <br />Page . 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.