My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07149
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:58 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:06:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.765
Description
White River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
3/1/1994
Author
USFS
Title
Snowmass Ski Area - Record of Decision - Final Environmental Impact Statement - White River National Forest - Aspen Ranger District
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ , "7 <br />n~.' ,.\ ...!) <br />U '" ,." .~ <br /> <br />detachable chair. Summer uses at the Elk Camp summit station would be limited <br />to sightseeing, a small observation deck, and hiking. <br /> <br />An interpretive hiking trail would be developed in the vicinity of the Cafe <br />Suzanne area. A biking trail between the Elk Camp summit and Cafe Suzanne will <br />utilize the existing Elk Camp service road. Mountain biking access to the <br />western portion of the permit area will be available via the Turkey Trot, Alpine <br />Springs, or Sam's Knob lifts. If the Sheer Bliss or Sam's Knob gondolas are <br />built, the summit station for these facilities will serve as primary staging <br />areas for summer uses. Trails will be designed and separated between hiking and <br />biking uses. <br /> <br />Mountain biking access will be coordinated with guided jeep tours to Elk Camp and <br />Sam's Knob through routing or scheduling to avoid conflicts. <br /> <br />An area closure would be instituted during the summer months for those portions <br />of Burnt Mountain uphill of the Government Trail and east of the ridge that <br />separates Burnt Mountain from the Elk Camp pod. A new spur trail would connect <br />to the relocated Government Trail via the Funnel ski trail. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Public demand for summer recreation opportunities within upper Roaring Fork <br />Valley continues to rise at a dramatic rate. The explosion in the popularity of <br />mountain biking has greatly contributed to this demand. The activities and <br />facilities I am authorizing will provide outstanding opportunities to area <br />visitors and will relieve some of the use pressure being experienced on existing <br />recreational resources elsewhere on the Forest. <br /> <br />The resort industry in the Town of Snowmass Village (TOSV) has historically <br />suffered through major down-turns in business during the non-skiing seasons. <br />Only 15 to 20 percent of the commercial activity in Snowmass occurs during the <br />summer; whereas the City of Aspen is much more balanced with 45 to 50 percent of <br />its tourist business occurring in the summer. The approved facilities and summer <br />uses should significantly contribute to establishing more of a balanced economy <br />in TOSV. <br /> <br />CONDITIONS <br /> <br />Conditions governing summer uses were outlined in the facility descriptions <br />above. Other mitigation and monitoring requirements are specified in the FEIS <br />Mitigation and Monitoring Plan. <br /> <br />Commercial operations for new activities that are not tied to the ski area's <br />infrastructure (i.e., buildings, lifts, etc.) will be offered to potential <br />operators through a prospectus/bid process. <br /> <br />C. PROPOSED MDP COMPONENTS NOT AUTHORIZED <br /> <br />1. Large Summit Facility on .Burnt Mountain <br /> <br />RECORD OF DECISION <br /> <br />Page. 19 <br /> <br /> <br />Based on the environmental impacts disclosed in the FEIS, I do not believe a <br />large summit facility (20-30, 000 sq. ft. with restaurants and interpretive <br />center), as proposed by the permittee, is an appropriate use of this public <br />resource. The proximity of Burnt Mountain to important wildlife habitats and to <br />the MB-SW boundary would make. mitigating adverse effects to acceptable levels <br />extremely difficult, if not impractical. I believe that the potential public <br />benefits of such a facility cannot be achieved without placing other important <br />resource values at a high risk of impairment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.