My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07146
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07146
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:56 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:06:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.110.60
Description
Colorado River Water Users Association
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
12/7/1967
Author
CRWUA
Title
Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHARLES W. HODDE <br /> <br />water in the stream as on the water in the bottom foot of the channel dredged out for its accomoda- <br />tion. Any reduction in flow increases channel maintenance problems. Ocean going ships get larger and <br />larger, requiring deeper channels for their passage. Within the past month, two such ships have made <br />news by being stuck on sandbars in the Columbia. <br /> <br />River regulation for flood control is being accomplished on the Columbia, but still has a long <br />way to go on coastal and west side streams. Industry and towns crowd onto the flood plains and re- <br />quire protection. Water planning and land planning develop a very close relationship in Northwest <br />coastal communities. <br /> <br />The Pacific Northwest has rather distinct geographical divisions of concepts for water planning, <br />dictated by the pattern of development of commerce and industry and the over-all supply of water <br />available. Southern Idaho and Eastern Oregon are forced by insufficient quantities of water to plan a- <br />head on a concept of consumptive use, much as is the case in the Pacific Southwest. The amount of <br />irrigable land adjacent to the upper Snake River and its tributaries in Southern Idaho and Eastern Ore- <br />gon, as well as that part of Oregon in the closed basins east of the Cascades, is greater than the waters <br />of those areas will supply. Generally the remainder of the region is supplied adequately for all fore- <br />seeable agricultural development if no other uses require priority over agriculture. However, this por- <br />tion of the region, including Central and Northern Idaho, Western Montana, all of Washington state, <br />and Oregon west of the Cascades, is not able to plan on a concept of consumptive use. Too much of <br />its present commerce and pattern of living has developed a dependence on uses of the water in the <br />steambed for us to contemplate dry river beds or even greatly reduced flows. Very substantial further <br />diversion of water for consumptive use must occur in the future, and each increase will cause some de- <br />crease in water available for power, fish, navigation, industrial cooling, quality maintenance, wildlife <br />support, and recreational use. Multiple use in this part of the region means much more than power, ir- <br />rigation, and municipal and industrial water supply. <br /> <br />A third factor spread through the region that is much prized by the Nation, possibly more by <br />those outside the Northwest than our local citizens, is dedication of resources to preservation of nat- <br />ural environment. How much is. illustrated by calling attention to the following present and imme- <br />diately prospective areas set aside. Mt. Rainier, the Olympics, Crater Lake, Grand Teton, Yellowstone <br />and Glacier National Parks are headwater sources. The North Cascades Park appears a certainty. The <br />Cascades and Bitterroot wilderness areas and the proposed wild rivers, such as the Rogue, Salmon and <br />south fork of the Skagit, also require consideration. Wildlife and migratory bird refuges are of <br />great importance to sportsmen of both the Northwest and the Southwest. All these must be fitted into <br />Qlr future plans in a substantial way. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Only in a place like the Pacific Northwest could we contemplate meeting all these require- <br />ments for the next 50 years or more in a fairly adequate way, not only for the residents of the North- <br />west, but for milliotE of citizens from regions favored in many ways, but not with adequate water <br />supplies for such a varied program. <br /> <br />We have under way in the Pacific Northwest, under sponsorship and coordination of the Paci- <br />fic Northwest River Basins Commission, a regional framework plan which we refer to as the Colum- <br />bia-North Pacific study. This study is part of the series of such studies being fostered by the Water Re- <br />sources Council - - three and eventually four of which will cover the Pacific Southwest. We are getting <br />close to the stage of identifying the resources of the next region and also the present use of the water <br />resources. The next step will be the projection of future needs and how they can be satisfied. This <br />study is being closely involved with the Commission staff, in order to effect a transition into produc- <br />tion of a detailed joint comprehensive plan for the Northwest with a minimum of inefficiency and <br />lost effort. Optimum benefits from either development or preservation is our goal. The central techni- <br />cal staff of the Columbia-North Pacific study is being housed with the Commission. Daily contact <br />with progress is occurring. A Commission staff member is chairman of the technical staff coordinating <br /> <br />-39- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.