Laserfiche WebLink
<br />WATER PLANNING IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST <br /> <br />By CHARLES W. HODDE. Chairman <br /> <br />Pacific Northwest River Basins Commission <br /> <br />A lot of Northwesterners visit Las Vegas, and some have been known to come home without <br />all their resources intact. I should make it clear at the start that I bring with me no authority to com- <br />mit beyond what I have in my purse, which was inventoried closely by my wife just as I got on the <br />plane for the trip. I have neither water nor money in volume enough to warrant special attention. <br /> <br />While we, of the Northwest, are classed as the "haves" in any water meeting in the West, we <br />find it difficult to fit ourselves into the role of the affluent traveler visiting the ghettos of despair <br />when we come to the Southwest and see your spectacular cities and beautifully tanned people. Truly, <br />we wish that someone could discover how we in the Northwest could have our rain in the night and <br />sun, of the quality of that in the Southwest, during the day. <br /> <br />We are engaged in the operation of a new social invention in the Northwest. Mankind has <br />become so accustomed to mechanical and mathematical inventions during this century, and we have <br />so generally accepted them as solutions to our problems, that little attention has been devoted to the <br />undeveloped wilderness of social organization with the purpose of developing a rational choice of <br />commitments for the future. In 'the field of water resource planning, a device is now available for <br />bringing together the efforts and abilities of all levels of government, with promise that the private <br />sector can also be involved in a constructive manner. Private enterprise in the old manner has gener- <br />ally been a subject for policing rather than consultation. This new organization is not assured success <br />through the provision of the Law under which it is organized. People are neither chemicals that can be <br />mixed with an assured reaction, nor levers or pulleys that will respond in an assured manner when put <br />together in a certain pattern. We do believe, though, that we have a method available with which to <br />match each mission against each of many others in the field of water planning, and we think the chem- <br />istry of human confrontation will greatly accelerate the definition of both need and goals. <br /> <br />The Pacific Northwest River Basins Commission was established by Executive Order under <br />provisions of the Water Resources Planning Act of 1965, on March 6,1967. It was the first of the new <br />federal-state coordinating entities established under Title II of that Act. The Pacific Northwest River <br />Basins Commission has members representing the states of Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington and <br />Wyoming, and the federal departments of the Army; Agriculture; Interior; Health, Education and Wel- <br />fare; Transportation; Commerce; Housing and Urban Development; the Federal Power Commission; <br />and the U.S. Entity for the Columbia River Treaty. <br /> <br />The jurisdiction of the Commission includes all the state of Washington; the state of Oregon <br />except that portion draining into the Smith, Klamath and Goose Lake systems along the California <br />border; all Idaho except the Bear River drainage, and it includes those portions of Wyoming and Mon- <br />tana draining into the Columbia River system. <br /> <br />The Commission during its first seven months of operation has established its headquarters in <br />Vancouver, Washington, adopted bylaws, guidelines for staffing, a personnel manual, operating pro- <br />cedures, a system of interagency committees, and has several special committees concerned with spec- <br />ific planning problems. It has an initial staff of seven persons in addition to the Chairman, and re- <br />ceives support from approximately 175 state and federal technical persons associated with its commit- <br />tee work. It is providing office space and some support services for our principal interagency region- <br />wide study under way. <br /> <br />The Commission proposes operation on a budget for the fiscal years 1968 and 1969 of approx- <br />imately $210,000 per year for staff support, half provided by the combined state contributions and <br />half by the Federal Government through appropriation to the Water Resources Council. <br /> <br />We believe the organizational structure, bylaws and other implementing action taken to date <br /> <br />-37- <br /> <br />