Laserfiche WebLink
<br />NORMAN E. PEHRSON <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />At this point, I wish to give both Los Angeles County and Orange County an encouraging pat <br />on the back for the fine job they are doing - not only in their development of ground water supplies, <br />but also in the successful uphill battle they are waging to protect those supplies against contamination <br />by ocean water. Years of drought and the demands of a burgeoning population have contributed to a <br />lowering of the water table in these counties. With lowering of the water table, ocean water moving <br />landward has posed a serious threat to the ground water supply. Recognizing the need for immediate <br />remedial measures, both counties have embarked - both singly and jointly - on massive programs for <br />the prevention of sea-water intrusion by constructing hydraulic barriers (wells) along the coast. Some <br />of the Colorado River water imported by Los Angeles and Orange Counties is pumped into injection <br />wells that are part of the hydraulic barrier. The program, which is still continuing, has been highly <br />successful in protecting the ground water supply. <br /> <br />Now a word about important studies currently under way for Arizona's Santa Cruz River ba- <br />sin, which comprises an area of 8,000 square miles, mostly in southern Arizona. We believe that our <br />findings in these studies will be of inestimable value to an area periodically menaced by damaging <br />floods and constantly threatened by a diminishing water supply. Within the basin are the cities and <br />towns of Tucson, Nogales, Eloy, and Casa Grande. This rapidly growing area depends on underground <br />reservoirs for its water supply. However, continuous pumping has caused a steady decline in the water <br />table, a decline that averages from 2 to 4 feet per year in the Tucson area and that will continue unless <br />the underground reservoirs are replenished. In developing a plan of improvement for flood control and <br />water conservation in the basin, our basic aim will be to insure that the underground reservoirs in the <br />basin are used as storage reservoirs for floodwaters wherever feasible. Water demand in the Tucson <br />area is expected to increase from 260,000 acre-feet in 1963 to 510,000 acre-feet in 2000; and in the <br />Nogales area, from 1,570 acre-feet in 1965 to 9,670 acre-feet in 2000. Ground water recharge will <br />help satisfy these demands considerably. <br /> <br />Before we complete the comprehensive report for the Santa Cruz River basin, we will prepare <br />two interim reports for the Tucson area - one for the RiIlito Creek drainage area and the other for the <br />Santa Cruz River from near the San Xavier Mission to the convluence with Rillito Creek. The need for <br />flood control improvements in the Tucson area is urgent - hence, the need for interim reports. A po- <br />tential disaster area exists at the confluence of Pantano Wash and Tanque Verde Wash, where an ex- <br />pensive residential development has been built along the flood plain. Downstream, on Rillito Creek, <br />more subdividing is under way in the flood plain. To provide badly needed protection against floods <br />in the area and at the same time protect and augment the existing water supply, we are considering <br />channel improvements operating in conjunction with storage dams. The plan of improvement being <br />considered includes about 18 miles of wide earth bottom channel on RiIlito Creek and dams on Pan- <br />tano Wash and at the confluence of Tanque Verde Wash and Sabino Canyon. The dams would release <br />the water into the earth bottom channel, where drop structures placed at intervals would flatten the <br />channel slope and permit maximum percolation of water to the underground reservoirs. <br /> <br />The broadbrush sketch that I have just completed points upthe Los Angeles District's ground <br />water recharge activities over vast areas of the Southwest, where the water supply problems grow in <br />complexity each day and where in turn the work of each agency involved in water resources develop- <br />ment becomes increasingly more complex. We expect that our experience will be supplemented by the <br />many research studies now under way by various organizations and agencies to develop new measures <br />and new techniques. Weather modification, reclamation of waste water, desalting, reuse of water, <br />nuclear excavation - these are a few of the areas in which valuable study and experimentation are be- <br />ing made. <br /> <br />I am especially intrigued by the studies made at the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory of the <br />University of California at Berkeley on the economics of ground water recharge by nuclear means. <br />The report, prepared by Professor David K. Todd, stressed the need for artificial recharge of ground <br />water, especially in water-deficient areas where surface storage facilities are inadequate and where <br />suitable reservoir sites are lacking. It indicates that nuclear explosives could prove useful in creating <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />-13- <br /> <br />