My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07128
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:51 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:06:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09A
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/13/1990
Title
Draft GCES Research Flow Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. FEE 05 ':'0 ;;-: 3.J <br /> <br />?: 3 <br /> <br />Research Diecharaes <br /> <br />Discharge variables that have been identified as driving <br />variables are (1) the magnitude of fluctuation, (2) the minimum <br />discharge, (3) the rate of change in fluctuating discharges both <br />for increasing and decreasing releases, and (4) seasonal aspects <br />of 1-3. These variables have been identified and are to be <br />tested in hypotheses HO-1 to HO-7 in the Research Plan. <br /> <br />In determining the discharges needed to produce adequate response <br />curves, a dendroqrUl has been used (Fiqure 1). This figure shows <br />a dichotomy between constant and fluctuating discharges. The <br />fluctuating discharges are divided between discharges with low <br />and high fluctuations (i.e., range between daily minima and <br />maxima). Further divisions take into account the need to test <br />various minimum discharges and ramping rates. The fluctuating <br />diacharges (in dashed boxes) are put at the same level, in the <br />diagram, in terms of daily volume as the comparable constant <br />discharges. <br /> <br />To test the influence of one driving variable on a particular <br />Canyon resource, it is essential to keep other interactive <br />variables constant. If this were carried to its ultimate extreme, <br />the number of required research discharges would be <br />unrealistically high. The number shown in Figure 1 then becomes <br />a workable and realistic number of discharge regimes. <br /> <br />In some cases it is impossible to keep all interactive variables <br />constant. For example, if the variable to be studied is <br />magnitude of discharge fluctuation, the minimum discharge could <br />be kept constant (e.g, discharge A, D or E, and constant 3000, <br />Figure 1): but, althouqh the daily volume could be the same for <br />A, D or E, it would be considerably less tor the constant 3000. <br />To use a constant discharge with volume equal to A, or 0 or E, a <br />constant of 8,000 or 11,000 would have to be used. Ramping rates <br />would also be variable. In a case where minimum discharge is the <br />experimental variable, fluctuation and ramping can be kept <br />constant (e.g., diSCharges A, 5, C: Figure 1) but the volume must <br />obviouelY follow the increasing minimum discharges. <br /> <br />As a result of limiting the number of research discharqes to <br />tho.e shown in Figure 1, the response curve graphs for a <br />particular experimental variable will have a series of curves <br />tied to other interactive variables. This emphasizes the <br />interactive nature of all of the driving variables as well as <br />many of the response variables. <br /> <br />Research discharge sequencing should tie together controlled <br />fluctuating discharges with similar (by volume) constant <br />discharges and be preceded or followed by normal operation <br />discharges with similar volumes and patterns. Each research <br />discharge sxperiment should also be followed by a low, constant <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.