Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t"'j <br />U) <br />..-l <br />o <br />c") <br />'~-::> <br /> <br />CONTENTS (Continued) <br /> <br />Paqe <br /> <br />Employment <br />Housing <br />Other <br /> <br />and Income <br /> <br />32 <br />32 <br />33 <br /> <br />CHAPTER IV <br />CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION <br /> <br />36 <br />36 <br />36 <br />44 <br /> <br />General . . . . . <br />Environmental Assessment <br />Comment Letters <br /> <br />ACRONYMS USED <br /> <br />67 <br /> <br />REFERENCES <br /> <br />68 <br /> <br />ATTACHMENT A <br /> <br />70 <br /> <br />ATTACHMENT B <br /> <br />72 <br /> <br />TABLES <br /> <br />Paqe <br /> <br />Estimated accomplishments of the recommended plan . 5 <br />Additional acreage needed for rights-of-way . . . . 10 <br />Comparison of alternative plans cost effectiveness 16 <br />Average TDS concentrations at major river stations 20 <br />Salt loading in the Grand Valley Unit area from present ground water <br />sources .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 <br />Price Ditch improvements construction phase income and employment <br />impacts .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 <br />Stubb Ditch improvements construction phase income and employment <br />impacts .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 <br />Incremental cost effectiveness analysis Stage Two plan of study 41 <br />Incremental cost effectiveness analysis Stage Two plan of study 42 <br />Canal increments not included under alternatives A and B <br />(Grand Valley Unit) . . . . . . . . . . . 42 <br />Canal increments not included under alternatives A and B <br />(Grand Valley Unit) . . . . . . . . . . . 43 <br /> <br />iii <br />