Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"-:l" <br />00 <br />...-t <br />o <br />" <br />::::' <br /> <br />Chapter I II <br /> <br />AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND <br />ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES <br /> <br />Table 5 <br />Salt loading in the Grand Valley Unit <br />area from present ground water sources <br /> <br />Source <br />Irrigation sources <br />Canals <br />Laterals <br />On-farm ditches <br />Deep percolation from irrigated fields <br />Orchard Mesa Power Canal <br />Highline Lake 1 <br />Natural sources <br />Total <br /> <br />Outflow <br />(tons/vear) <br /> <br />136,000 <br />99,800 <br />92,700 <br />173,500 <br />12,000 <br />24,000 <br />37,400 <br />575,400 <br /> <br />1 Tonnage attributed to Highline Lake. Estimated using <br />a separate Highline Lake budget. <br /> <br />Impacts <br /> <br />Surface Water.--No significant change in the salt loading from surface <br />sources is expected under any of the alternatives. <br /> <br />In the short term, sediment yields from construction material sites would <br />increase; however, properly planned excavations and revegetation would <br />reduce this problem. A section 402 permit would be required for any <br />discharges during construction and this would limit pollution of surface <br />waters. <br /> <br />Ground Water.--Under the no-action alternative, salt load reductions from <br />other segments of the Grand Valley Unit would continue. The salt loading <br />to the Colorado River is expected to decrease by 11,500 tons annually with <br />the recommended plan, all from ground water sources. The reduction would <br />be due to reduced canal seepage rates. Table 3 shows the expected salt <br />loading conditions of the alternatives. <br /> <br />VeQetation and Wildlife <br /> <br />Present Conditions <br /> <br />Veaetation.--Vegetation within the proposed project area can be <br />characterized as a mosaic of agricultural lands, wetlands, and shrubland <br />communities modified and supported by irrigation and water-use practices <br />over the last century. The development of irrigated agriculture has <br />created plant communities that differ from the salt-desert shrub <br />associations that historically occurred here, and still occur just north of <br />the stubb Ditch. Plant communities, including cultivated crops, maintained <br />by ditch water support wildlife historically restricted to natural washes <br />or the river bottom, or in cases such as the ring-necked pheasant, species <br />exotic to the Grand Valley. Wildlife species that evolved with, and are <br />dependent upon, salt desert vegetation have been reduced in the Unit area. <br /> <br />21 <br />