Laserfiche WebLink
<br />U's withdrawn from greater depths, <br />contains higher concentrations of <br />these nutrients. <br />Releases of cold, clear water and <br />reduced transport of organic mate- <br />rial from the upper Colorado River <br />basin have dramatically changed <br />conditions for the aquatic macro- <br />invertebrates downstream from the <br />dam (Stevens et a!. 1997b). Thus, the <br />food supply available for native fish <br />in the Grand Canyon has changed <br />greatly. Observations made in the <br />less regulated upper Colorado River <br />basin indicate that high densities of <br />aquatic insects currently exist on <br />gravel bars and that native fish feed <br />on a variety of terrestrial and aquatic <br />invertebrates (Dill 1944, Vanicek <br />1967, Tyus and Minckley 1988). Pre- <br />dam river runners in the Grand Can- <br />yon described large accumulations <br />of woody debris in eddies, and the <br />decomposition of this wood prob- <br />ably supported a suite of aquatic and <br />terrestrial invertebrates. <br />The Colorado River benthos in <br />the Grand Canyon is productive but <br />depauperare in species. Chironomids, <br />simuliids, oligochaetes, and an in- <br />troduced amphipod, Gammarus <br />lacustris, are the most common <br />[macroinvertebrates. More than 65% <br />of the aquatic plant and invertebrate <br />standing biomass of the entire Grand <br />Canyon is produced upstream from <br />Lees Ferry (Stevens et a!. 1997b). <br />The occurrence of terrestrial macro- <br />invertebrates in adult humpback <br />chub stomachs increases downstream <br />because of resupply from unregu- <br />lated tributaries. Since construction <br />of the dam, decomposition of woody <br />debris has a minor effect on the in- <br />vertebrate communities because rela- <br />tively little of this matter is stored on <br />the channel banks and none is resup- <br />plied from upstream. <br /> <br />Fish assemblage. The fish assemblage <br />of the Colorado River through the <br />Grand Canyon has altered dramati- <br />cally during the past century, but <br />this change is related only partly to <br />dam-caused variations in discharge, <br />sediment transport, temperature, <br />nutrients, and food base. Before the <br />late 1800s, 74% of the 35 fish spe- <br />cies native to the entire Colorado <br />River basin were endemic, the high- <br />est percentage among North Ameri- <br />can river basins (Miller 1959). Eight <br /> <br />740 <br /> <br />of these species once lived in rhe <br />Grand Canyon (Miller 1959). The <br />eight native warm-water fishes dif- <br />fered little in their temperature pref- <br />erences but had different feeding <br />strategies and spatial fidelities (Fig- <br />ure 4). <br />Three of the native fish species, <br />Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus <br />lucius), bony tail (Gila elegans), and <br />roundtail chub (Gi/a robusta), were <br />extirpated from the Grand Canyon <br />by the 1970s (Minckley 1991). Ra- <br />zorback suckers are currently rare in <br />the Grand Canyon; only ten speci- <br />mens were reported between 1944 <br />and 1990 (Valdez and Ryel 1997). <br />By contrast, the humpback chub <br />population in the Grand Canyon is <br />the largest of six extant populations <br />in the Colorado River basin. <br />Cold water releases impede re- <br />production of native fish. Native <br />speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus), <br />blue head sucker (Catostomus disco- <br />bolus), and flannelmouth sucker <br />(Catostomus /atipinnis) continue to <br />reproduce in several tributaries in <br />the Grand Canyon, but there is very <br />little reproduction by any of the na- <br />tive species in the mainstem. For- <br />successful spawning, these fish need <br />a minimum temperature of about 16 <br />oC, and in the Colorado River these <br />temperarures occur only immediately <br />upstream from Lake Mead for a short <br />time in the summer. <br />At the same time that reproduc- <br />tion of native fish has been reduced, <br />competition and predarion by non- <br />native fish have increased (Minckley <br />1991, Douglas et a!. 1994). There <br />had already been a marked decline in <br />populations of many native fishes by <br />the late 1950s (Miller 1959), pre- <br />sumably because of pressure from <br />non-narive fish and blockage of fish <br />migration caused by the first <br />mainstem dams. Non-native carp <br />(Cyprinus carpio) and channel cat- <br />fish (Ictalurus punctatus), which are <br />warm-water species, were introduced <br />to the basin in 1890 or so and were <br />dominant in the lower Colorado <br />River by 1911. Cold-water species, <br />such as rainbow trout, brown trout <br />(Salmo trutta), cutthroat trout (Oncor- <br />hynchus clark ii) , and brook trout <br />(Salvelinus rontina/is), were intro- <br />duced after 1919. Warm-water <br />centrarchid game fishes were intro- <br />duced into Lake Mead in the 1930s, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />and other non-native species gained <br />access as incidentals or bait fish. <br />Currently, there are 11 principal <br />non-native species-three cold-wa- <br />ter and eight warm-water-in the <br />Grand Canyon (Valdez and Ryel <br />1997). Each of these species was <br />already in the Grand Canyon at the <br />time the dam was completed. Non- <br />native warm-water fishes fill eco- <br />logical niches similar to rhose filled <br />by the remaining narive species, and <br />the non-native cold-water species oc- <br />cupy new thermal niches (Figure 4). <br />Niche overlap has increased selec- <br />tion against native fishes, further <br />threatening their existence. <br />The cold temperatures of the regu- <br />lated Colorado River in the Grand <br />Canyon restrict the distribution of <br />non-native warm-water species. <br />Channel catfish and carp are less <br />abundant than in the upper Colo- <br />rado River basin, where summer river <br />temperatures are warm. These spe- <br />cies presently spawn only in the Linle <br />Colorado River, because they require <br />temperatures of over 20 oc. Popula- <br />tions of fathead minnows (Pime- <br />phales prome/as), black bullhead <br />(Ictalurus melas), and green sunfish <br />(Lepomis macrochirus) are also low <br />in the mainstem and occur primarily <br />downstream from the Little Colo- <br />rado River. Few of the warm-water <br />fishes that are common in Lake Mead, <br />such as striped bass (Marone saxa- <br />ti/is), ascend into the Grand canyon'i <br />The trout fishery between the dam <br />and Lees Ferry is maintained by pe- <br />riodic releases of hatchery-reared <br />fish. There is considerable natural <br />reproduction in this fishery, although <br />water temperature during spawning <br />between December and February is <br />usually 10 oC, below the optimum <br />for trout. Trour upstream from Lees <br />Ferry do not appear to mix with the <br />self-sustaining rainbow trout popu- <br />lations that occur downstream. The <br />trout fishery is not only of recre- <br />ational importance: These down- <br />stream populations have been preyed <br />on by wintering bald eagles since <br />1982 (Brown and Stevens 1992). <br /> <br />P:~' <br />t: <br />~. <br />~.. <br />VI <br />iI.-_..~ <br />~~ <br />":"..". <br />., <br />{" <br />~':'-o <br />:( <br /> <br />~.... <br /> <br />-.. <br />,;.... <br /> <br />':,. <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />",. <br /> <br />to. <br /> <br />~~:..; <br /> <br />f> <br />, . <br />f <br /> <br />~.< <br />~w.; <br />ri.".. <br />F...... <br />f~~.i <br /> <br />~. <br />.~. . <br />, <br />~ <br /> <br />, .' <br />< <br />~ . .. <br /> <br />, <br />,.' <br /> <br />r.. ' <br /> <br />;.. <br /> <br />i <br />r <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />t~~.~: <br />~);1 <br /> <br />toO <br />, - <br />t..' <br /> <br />Riparian vegetation. Glen Canyon <br />Dam and its operations have altered <br />the riparian ecosystem (Turner and <br />Karpiscak 1980, Johnson 1991). <br />Early photographs of the Grand Can- <br />yon show that channel banks inun- <br /> <br />BioScience Vol. 48 No.9 <br />