My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07101
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07101
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:45 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:05:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
1000
Description
CWCB General Files - Congressional Correspondence-Legislation-Publications-Etc
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
5/19/1971
Author
Wayne N Aspinall
Title
Testimony of Wayne N Aspinall Before the Subcommittee on Public Works Appropriations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />I) I" r.. - . <br />< " ;;. , " ~ <br />Ut~C;<jJ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br />the problem. It is recommended that at least $200,000 be appropriated <br /> <br />for fiscal year 1972. <br /> <br />Mr. Chairman, in keeping with my longstanding belief that your <br /> <br />Subcommittee and the legislative Committee should maintain a high <br /> <br />degree of coordination I would like to discuss very briefly the <br /> <br />status of the legislative program of the Bureau of Reclamation. <br /> <br />The large backlog of authorized projects continues to pose a <br /> <br />philosophical problem to many of us. It is difficult to rationalize <br /> <br />major additional authorizations tmt would have the effect of further <br /> <br />adding to this stockpile of authorized programs. On the other <br /> <br />side of the coin, however, we know that there are yet to be auth- <br /> <br />orized programs of a high priority, and some with an urgent require- <br /> <br />ment for development. We have the added obligation to maintain a <br /> <br />vestige of faith with program interests who, in many cases, have <br /> <br />worked for several years on behalf of their schemes. When caught <br /> <br />between these seemingly contradictory forces, about all we can do <br /> <br />is to proceed with a deliberately selective program of new auth- <br /> <br />orizations. Under the criteria that we have adopted to guide our <br /> <br />consideration, we give balanced weight to urgency, size, type of <br /> <br />purposes served, relative feasibility, and chronology in terms of <br /> <br />when the proposal reaches us. Using these factors, we can gen- <br /> <br />erally make a judgment that lets some work go forward without <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.