<br />..OC0965
<br />
<br />The first is that when positive accretions occur all of the natural
<br />
<br />
<br />..:...:....:."..."...!,'."
<br />c,;~
<br />;~u
<br />"."
<br />'f
<br />
<br />, .,<.
<br />
<br />,,,\
<br />
<br />.,.,., .,> ",,'
<br />
<br />\,..'
<br />
<br />losses are assigned to the'accretions. This condition is not a true one, but,
<br />
<br />because of the way accretions are computed and because of the lack of data
<br />
<br />..
<br />.~
<br />}'
<br />.x,
<br />~.
<br />
<br />on river losses no other assumption can be made.
<br />l.",,~
<br />The second e~eou~ assumption is that uses in a river section ,
<br />will be in the dil:e~ratio' to the amounts of the different kinds of water i,"
<br />------- -." . lr
<br />------- "j
<br />arriving in the section in a given month. This too is beyond doubt an untJ!li.~\
<br />" . ',.,' .',',
<br />,'I J
<br />situation, but without further knowledge (difficult or impossible to obtain) 11
<br />'i
<br />it is considered to be the fairest and most rational approach to the problem. ,
<br /><"-
<br />
<br />. ,.,..,.,.,. .'. ",' ;/"'f" """",).""". ...~.~n':"''\~I:::~,~,~~~~~~,'.",,~~;:~~(:;;;:,;.:~:]<~:~:::~il~~~~:~,~~~:~:..~:~{=:L:"J"'~",:A:'ri~:'~:
<br />"""'''''''''''''''~e:re'-:lma.t.L:amOtni'lfs'~r;<fri{tei~''a:rr:rV1.rit'e:tvGaroen'City, ~ich, because 6f our meth~' . '.
<br />
<br />:;"
<br />
<br />",
<br />
<br />'-1'
<br />
<br />of calculation, purportedly. come from supplies crossing the Stateline, but
<br />
<br />'..'
<br />.X
<br />I'r '\
<br />,
<br />
<br />which probably do not travel as far as Garden City. Any adjustment in the
<br />
<br />study because of such values was considered unnecessary since the water invo~Yed
<br />
<br />is only a fraction of a percent of the total water dealt with.
<br />",'~~""" ., '
<br />:.f,f:",."; ".i:i<.:i:IJ,'~l:!',i1f!.t'!;,\1;>:i~P~;~~~l!~;j;.Qin~l\~Ill, PlPbability of
<br />
<br />,- ,- . "' -. '; .. - ~;yi>, _,., .
<br />minor error~iI'~:
<br />
<br />''''''',.",:'.';>
<br />
<br />in the results which are so far within the limits of accuracy as to warrant no
<br />
<br />consideration.
<br />
<br />,-,.
<br />
<br />. ;,.
<br />
<br />,""")"" ", 'J .,.' " .
<br />^~Je(~d'/....
<br />Ac..carllcy oft Results
<br />
<br />"';,'4:,:~\ '~.,;..,
<br />
<br />~;if:it),:_~-.'
<br />
<br />
<br />';;"-"--"~'-',"" :,:-..
<br />
<br />Conclusions as to
<br />
<br />A~iae fl Vlll the L"v ~w''P'lI..'UlltrS'l:!'S.",:f'-pes.s;i.bl.&.~or~he study is
<br />accurate for practical purposes.
<br />
<br />As to tIle two prillcipal errors ..:3,tated abov~, it is our opinion that
<br />
<br />the error involved is not substantial and that it becomes inconsequential
<br />
<br />when the same method of analysis is followed for all sections and all conditions,
<br />historic and future. '
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />'~i!~'~::..:th:>.t.1.'\.~(;':Il...oi-~~,.,:.~,i,.~.:~:;:r.~~..~';~~\.'~-1 ~l: ~~(lt\':' ~'~;:l~:~'",(:,-,}),~ I ~';_.;
<br />
<br />-9-,
<br />
<br />'-;:;-*:~~~~" :1
<br />
<br />l' ;~\1-: 'JiiM-;;~~t ,!~-~;.?j~ .:.J' '(~;':1 :~~'t, ,,,;, ,r~'~:!~8t:::'~'1ji;~'-~>>_:-i'\f
<br />
<br />~. .
<br />
<br />- ',' .-; ~
<br />
<br />. <~~~L"
<br />
<br />"'-'-':'"
<br />
<br />:"._~'~' <--j.
<br />
<br />"
<br />,io J
<br />,
<br />__'it;,,-:!,dtii
<br />
|