|
<br />00('961
<br />
<br />, , " ~.: /,', ':"':> ;'
<br />
<br />",,';.',
<br />"'" .
<br />
<br />:';,,'.'" .-:,;t'#':':'",~ '
<br />
<br />" A
<br />
<br />".-,',
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />-" ".}.
<br />
<br />, ',' '. ,~,
<br />
<br />.~. '-',F ",-.
<br />
<br />, ,-"~~:lrW~!.\~:
<br />
<br />Details
<br />
<br />of l4ethod y ~()I)~l~~.f~(lqo ~"4-1-)
<br />
<br />", :.' ~
<br />~iii,~-
<br />X(~~,'.
<br />'~--'~;.~.,c;
<br />
<br />In order that our assumptions and work may be better understood
<br />
<br />"I
<br />
<br />:,;
<br />
<br />by the Committee the following explanation of steps taken in the study is
<br />
<br />given.
<br />
<br />
<br />I'"
<br />I 1. Diversions by.the Keesee,Ft,. Bent a,ndAmity Canals were ;
<br />
<br />. ~! .",,'" to '" .... M''''''' "',m Cod""" ci".~',i.na-""th;'r"".,. /i,).",,':,':
<br />
<br />~ below Ca~.~"helow-~e Amity hea,?tate, this assumption ' is' ,
<br />
<br />~ substantially corr,ect",f, q"lr praQtkc:.lfi.f. purJlosea~, ' .- - ~}1,'
<br />~ W~')I-.-..(.;fTi"WJ'",^ i4J<4V/Mlt't1"u<-, , ,1
<br />' 2. Other ..1!ll'Elll"between Caddoa and Lama!" wer'eassumed to be ' :,'
<br />
<br />. '.........n"_"'".;p,..,;U;,;;;~~~~,....."'"...~~~'!ti.Jif,~~"'1I..it~"~~,,~,!ij!lj
<br />'''''~~'t~''''(~!'I\'f: _ :"". ," ,,;'1f>!Il1!""''' ' ' :wR15 : ,~.,;tl'~:e'!'l!l't .,;,-, ,'- 'I
<br />
<br />between the Gaddoa flow remaining after the said diversions and the
<br />
<br />:;~
<br />
<br />~positive accretions in the 6addoa-Lamar section.
<br />
<br />IException - ffuen potential upstream uses were equal to the Caddoa flow itl ;(,
<br />
<br />L- was assumed that no Caddoa water passed Lamar.. ~
<br />'l:!~ 1.fI i;~:<";. .m;~,~>.~~:_~,.J:':df~"'c,i\.o:!;,'
<br />. ''';~~;''I;f:i';;:'';;;'';~;~;/3l't'AAie1;et'tt1l(~''liI~~(ii~~oIi at L8inar between
<br />~ \ ----------
<br />"~' \ Caddoa flow and accretions passing that station. Uses between Lamar and
<br />.~"
<br />
<br />, ""',:;, !,,!:~:~~,;~~~;~~~~!::::~:;:~.: ~:::;;:!::~;S~=:::;:~e~~~:~~:;m~,::::~:::~~~~",0 .,..' ",""
<br />
<br />
<br />~. ~ . ,
<br />,11. :
<br />~ jpassing Lamar plus the positive accretions in the section.
<br />I
<br />
<br />(I 4. As in the case of the Lamar~Stateline section, the method used
<br />
<br />
<br />resulted in a determination of amounts of Caddoa water and accretions passing
<br />
<br />
<br />I the Stateline. For the period of available records on Fild Horse Creek and
<br />
<br />
<br />: Holly Drain, if the accretions passing the Stateline ~ere lesa than the
<br />
<br />i combined flow of Wild Horse Creek and Holly Drain~ they were increased to the
<br />I '
<br />,
<br />i amount of such"fl~w ~Il. tecorded. cont"ributionsof flild Horse Creek prior to
<br />.; ~ 1.4. /-In.!?:,_;/ hUe / '
<br />~ 1924 were considered negl:tg:t1J:V;. ' I, "
<br />~-
<br />
<br />, '- ') - " '"" 'y ,",',kd' 'F'
<br />l.lO~';~~~i.i~Wl i~~r<,n:"'~l :~~ll,~;'i,.;;;tl;~:"'~r';<~l~~~';")H~,j''1''k~N';':+-;~;;;~~. c ':, .:it, ~~~:W;:,' ..,:_~- > :/'~!'J_.'*~.~'t.~~"'Fo .~,~
<br />!:~'.,~~ "1"~~'I.,.~"";. . "-._f';':!' .J~," "" ...- '::"'_,,~,' "._"..<.;
<br />
<br />f~;~~''W,l;~:~'W;<fi'01..t:'\tf"!~~")~~'i''~ .
<br />
<br />-5-
<br />
<br />,
<br />.'~'~
<br />
<br />,:~__,;l
<br />
<br />,
<br />.
<br />
<br />,',,-
<br />
<br />j'" .-'
<br />
<br />-' :-,;~.:~~~~ .'-
<br />_ ,J_n
<br />
<br />;'-'-.'
<br />
<br />~~-M''-~' }${~./1; _
<br />,_~ ;.z .,.;i ..ti~
<br />
<br />.:......:...,r.
<br />
|