<br />6
<br />
<br />r"'S'~
<br />4 , 'FRYING PAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT, COLORADO
<br />
<br />U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
<br />OFFICE OF THE SECRETAnY,
<br />Washington, D.C., May i, 1961.
<br />
<br />Bon. WAYNEN.AsPINALL,
<br />Chairman, Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs,
<br />HouI1e of Representatives, Washington, D.C.
<br />DEAR MR. ASPINALL: This is in response to your request for an expression of
<br />the views of this Department on H.R. 2200, H.R. 2107, H.R. 2208, and H.R.
<br />2209, bills "To authorize the construction, operation, and maintenance by the
<br />Secretarv of the Interior of the Fryingpun-Arkansas project, Colorauo."
<br />We recommend t.hat one of theRe bills be enacted, provided it is amended
<br />as hereinafter indicated.
<br />Th{'8e bills are II revised version of H.R. 02'29 and other bills, 86th Congress,
<br />on which this Department reported by letter dated March 25, 1900. They
<br />provide for the construction, operatioll, and maintenance by the Secretary
<br />of the Interior of tbe Fryingpan-Arkansas project, Colorado. The purposes
<br />served by tbe project would be the supplying of water for irrigation. lllunicipal,
<br />domestic. and industrial u::;es, generating and transmitting bydroel~l:tric power
<br />and energy, and controlling floods, and for other useful and beneficial purposes
<br />incidental thereto, including recreation and conservation and development
<br />of fish and wildlife.
<br />A rather full description of the engineering features of thiB proposed under-
<br />taking, of the purpo.ses which it wHl serve, and of the henefits which will be
<br />associated with it is readily available in the report of the Department of the
<br />Interior on the project which wn~ submitted on June 0, 1053, to the President
<br />of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives in accordance
<br />with the llrovisions of section 9(a) of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939, and
<br />which was printed ali House Document 187, 83d Congress.
<br />Since House Document 187 was printed, a number of changes in the project
<br />plan have been adopted which can be accommodated under the provisions of
<br />the legislation under consideration. A major modification is the substitution
<br />of Rueeli, and possihly Ashcroft Dam and Reservoir for Aspen Dam and Reservoir.
<br />Other change:,; include th~ elimination of tbe water treatment plant at Pueblo,
<br />a change in the point of diversion for service to Colorado Springs, the alldition
<br />of fllcilities to insure winter operation, and the withdrawal of certain lands
<br />from the Southeast Colorado Conservancy District. The effect of these changes
<br />and of changes in price levels and cost indexes on the physical plan and on the
<br />economic anu financial aspects of the project ure set forth in detail in the
<br />reevaluation statement, FrYingpan-Ark:msas project, Colorado, January 1960,
<br />a COlJY of which was attached to our ldter of March 2ti, 1900, reporting Oll B.B.
<br />92:!9, 86th Congress.
<br />For convenient reference by the committee, the purposes and eXlle(:tell accom-
<br />plishments of tbe project may be summarized thus: t.he project contemplntes
<br />(1) direrting through the project works from the Ronring Fork River Basin
<br />in western Colorado to the Arkansas River Basin in eastern Colorado approxi-
<br />mately 09,000 acre-feet of water per annum; (2) di.erting through the existing'
<br />works of the Twin Lakes Co. about 15,000 Dcre-feet per annum over and above
<br />what that company now divert~; (3) construction of storage on the eastern
<br />slope for the waters thus imported and, in addition, for eastern slope floodwaters
<br />snd winter flows averaging riO,OOO nnd 03,000 acre-feet per annum, respecth.ely.
<br />This plan will provide supplemental irrigation water for 280.000 acres of irri~
<br />gated lnnd in the Arkansas River Valley which do not now have an adequate
<br />water sUIlIlly, anel will supply expanding needs for municipal. domestic. and indus-
<br />trial water on botb sides of the Continental Divide. The project will prevent
<br />a large part of the flood damages along the Arkansas River which OCCllr, under
<br />present condition~, betwen PueblO and John Martin Reservoir. In accomplish~
<br />ing these primary pur Doses of the project, works will be provided for the genera-
<br />tIon of about 409 million kilowatt-hours of hydroelectric energy annually.
<br />As previously noted, the plan described in HOWie Doculllent 187 in..-ol,ed. con-
<br />struction of Aspen Dam and Reservoir on the Ronring Fork Ri.er on the western
<br />slope of the Continental Divide. This reservoir, the cost of which was included
<br />In the cost of the project, was designed to protect the wn ter ~uPllly of present
<br />and prospective western slaDe water users from any impairment through diver-
<br />sion of western slope waters to the Arkansas River Bnsin. Further studies
<br />have revealed that the same project purposes could be served from the proposed
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />','I
<br />
<br />"
<br />
|