Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6 <br /> <br />r"'S'~ <br />4 , 'FRYING PAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT, COLORADO <br /> <br />U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, <br />OFFICE OF THE SECRETAnY, <br />Washington, D.C., May i, 1961. <br /> <br />Bon. WAYNEN.AsPINALL, <br />Chairman, Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, <br />HouI1e of Representatives, Washington, D.C. <br />DEAR MR. ASPINALL: This is in response to your request for an expression of <br />the views of this Department on H.R. 2200, H.R. 2107, H.R. 2208, and H.R. <br />2209, bills "To authorize the construction, operation, and maintenance by the <br />Secretarv of the Interior of the Fryingpun-Arkansas project, Colorauo." <br />We recommend t.hat one of theRe bills be enacted, provided it is amended <br />as hereinafter indicated. <br />Th{'8e bills are II revised version of H.R. 02'29 and other bills, 86th Congress, <br />on which this Department reported by letter dated March 25, 1900. They <br />provide for the construction, operatioll, and maintenance by the Secretary <br />of the Interior of tbe Fryingpan-Arkansas project, Colorado. The purposes <br />served by tbe project would be the supplying of water for irrigation. lllunicipal, <br />domestic. and industrial u::;es, generating and transmitting bydroel~l:tric power <br />and energy, and controlling floods, and for other useful and beneficial purposes <br />incidental thereto, including recreation and conservation and development <br />of fish and wildlife. <br />A rather full description of the engineering features of thiB proposed under- <br />taking, of the purpo.ses which it wHl serve, and of the henefits which will be <br />associated with it is readily available in the report of the Department of the <br />Interior on the project which wn~ submitted on June 0, 1053, to the President <br />of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives in accordance <br />with the llrovisions of section 9(a) of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939, and <br />which was printed ali House Document 187, 83d Congress. <br />Since House Document 187 was printed, a number of changes in the project <br />plan have been adopted which can be accommodated under the provisions of <br />the legislation under consideration. A major modification is the substitution <br />of Rueeli, and possihly Ashcroft Dam and Reservoir for Aspen Dam and Reservoir. <br />Other change:,; include th~ elimination of tbe water treatment plant at Pueblo, <br />a change in the point of diversion for service to Colorado Springs, the alldition <br />of fllcilities to insure winter operation, and the withdrawal of certain lands <br />from the Southeast Colorado Conservancy District. The effect of these changes <br />and of changes in price levels and cost indexes on the physical plan and on the <br />economic anu financial aspects of the project ure set forth in detail in the <br />reevaluation statement, FrYingpan-Ark:msas project, Colorado, January 1960, <br />a COlJY of which was attached to our ldter of March 2ti, 1900, reporting Oll B.B. <br />92:!9, 86th Congress. <br />For convenient reference by the committee, the purposes and eXlle(:tell accom- <br />plishments of tbe project may be summarized thus: t.he project contemplntes <br />(1) direrting through the project works from the Ronring Fork River Basin <br />in western Colorado to the Arkansas River Basin in eastern Colorado approxi- <br />mately 09,000 acre-feet of water per annum; (2) di.erting through the existing' <br />works of the Twin Lakes Co. about 15,000 Dcre-feet per annum over and above <br />what that company now divert~; (3) construction of storage on the eastern <br />slope for the waters thus imported and, in addition, for eastern slope floodwaters <br />snd winter flows averaging riO,OOO nnd 03,000 acre-feet per annum, respecth.ely. <br />This plan will provide supplemental irrigation water for 280.000 acres of irri~ <br />gated lnnd in the Arkansas River Valley which do not now have an adequate <br />water sUIlIlly, anel will supply expanding needs for municipal. domestic. and indus- <br />trial water on botb sides of the Continental Divide. The project will prevent <br />a large part of the flood damages along the Arkansas River which OCCllr, under <br />present condition~, betwen PueblO and John Martin Reservoir. In accomplish~ <br />ing these primary pur Doses of the project, works will be provided for the genera- <br />tIon of about 409 million kilowatt-hours of hydroelectric energy annually. <br />As previously noted, the plan described in HOWie Doculllent 187 in..-ol,ed. con- <br />struction of Aspen Dam and Reservoir on the Ronring Fork Ri.er on the western <br />slope of the Continental Divide. This reservoir, the cost of which was included <br />In the cost of the project, was designed to protect the wn ter ~uPllly of present <br />and prospective western slaDe water users from any impairment through diver- <br />sion of western slope waters to the Arkansas River Bnsin. Further studies <br />have revealed that the same project purposes could be served from the proposed <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />','I <br /> <br />" <br />