Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~8::S <br /> <br />FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT, COLORADO <br /> <br />Mr. HALEY. About $18 million nonreimbursable. So that would <br />Jeave approximately $151 million that is reimbursable to the Federal <br />Government. <br />Mr. PALMER. Actually, it is $153,962,000. <br />1\fr.l-IALEY. I am just using rough figures here. <br />Mr. PALMER. Yes sir. <br />Mr. HALEY. Because a million dollnr's more or less does not. mean <br />anyt hing anymore.. .' <br />Now the interest on tlllS money that. IS relmbursable does not start <br />accumulating unt.il t.he project is completed1 is that right~. . <br />1111'. PALMER. No, sir, not completely. There are two klllds of m- <br />terest. involved j one is intere.st. during construction, which would a.p- <br />ply Oll the municipal-industrial and power ff'_utures and th~ other one, <br />of course is interest that would be earned after completIOn of con- <br />struction'through to payout, when that has been achieved. The inter- <br />est dllrinO' construction is listed in this payout. analysis. <br />Mr.IL~LEY. It is listed in there! <br />Mr. PAUIER. Yes, sir. <br />Mr. HALEY. At what.percent1 <br />Mr. PAL"ER. The current. cert.ificat.ion of the Treasnry, which is <br />2.U32 percent.. <br />. Mr. I-IALEY. Is t.he Treasury borrowing money at t.his figure now ~ <br />Mr. PALMER. Under the 'Vater Supply Act. formula, the interest. <br />rate certified by the Treasury is the amount. due ami payable on <br />long-term bonds having n maturity date, not callable, or maturing <br />for at least 15 years. all outstanding long-term obligations, in other <br />words, which, according to the celtificlltioll of the Treasury for this <br />yenr is 2.G32 percent. <br />Mr. H.'LEY. That. is what. they are paying for the money now! <br />Mr. PALMER. No, sir. That is the aveI"Rge cost of interest on all <br />long-term obligations of the Treasury. <br />1\11'. H,\LEY. Of course, when you get this money from the Treasury <br />aTHI from the taxpayers now Y011 are hn.Ting to pay approximately 5 <br />percent.. Is that not. true 1 <br />:Mr. P,\LMF.n. The chairman of t.he full eommittee made n very astute <br />obsernttion when he pointeel out that the water resource development <br />program, whether by the corps or by the Bureau or by any ot.her <br />agency of t.he Federal Go\"ernme,nt, ought to have a uniform interest <br />formula. The expression of Congress, fiS enunc.iated in the 'Vater <br />Supply Act. of 1958, is the formuli that nets t.his 2.632 as celi.ified by <br />the Treasury. It. is the same interest. formula t.hat would be used on <br />corps projeds or SCS project.s or any others where interest is in- <br />vol ved. <br />Mr. I-IALEY. Of course, that is where we are getting into trouble <br />on these thing-s und where I think t.he American people and the tax- <br />payers are being misled. I do not. think anybody can refute this: <br />That it is costing t.he Treasury of the United :::itates today approxi- <br />ma.tely 5 percent to horrow llloney and yon have to borrow money <br />in order to construct this. No\,' \\'hen you start paying that money <br />bac',k, ~rou pay it back based on a 2.()3~, so you have a ~nbsidy in there <br />that. the taxpayers all m'er the Nat.ion mnst. pick np over a period <br />of f.iO years of appruximately 21/~ pereent. Now 21jz percent over n <br />perioa of fiO years is a considerable amount. of money that. goes into <br />these subsi<lies. <br />