Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l <br /> <br />SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />t <br />J <br />. <br /> <br />1. Water District 2 serves as a strategic link between mountain and <br />front range tributary areas and downstream plains areas of the South Platte' <br />Basin. Because of this location, water users within Water District 2 <br />are dependent upon inflow from several sources and at several locations. <br />Thus, they experience quite different water supply situations within the <br />various reaches from year to year. Urbanization is rapidly taking ploce <br />in the districts above Water District 2, as well as in the upper section <br />of Weter District 2. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />2. River water sup~ The amount of river water available for <br />diversion under direct-flow decrees held by Water District 2 ditches has <br />changed over the years. Some ditches in the upper portion of the Water <br />District have experienced a reduction in diversions of direct-flow water, <br />whereas some ditches in the lower portion have been diverting an'increas- <br />ing amount during recent years. <br /> <br />3. Reservoir water~~ The amount of water remaining in storage <br />within Water District 2 after the close of the irrigation season has been <br />increasing over recent years, although the amount in storage at the begin- <br />ning of the season does not show this trend. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />4. Groundwater supply. A reservoir containing approxim2.tely 1.3 <br />mill ion acre-feet of groundwater underlies the ",ain stem of the 'South <br />Platte River in Weter District 2. In addition, an estimated 320,000 acre- <br />feet of groundwater underlies Beebe Draw between Barr Lake and Latham <br />Reservoir, giving a total of some 1.6 million acre-feet of groundwater in <br />Water District 2. During an average year less than 10% (120,000 to <br />140,000 acre-feet) of this storage capacity is actively used. During <br />years of heavy pumping (such as 1954 and 1956) the amount withdrawn hilS <br />reached 200,000 to 210,000 acre-feet within Weter District 2. <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />5. Inflow, return flow and outflow cheracterislLcs. The relation- <br />ship of inflow to outflow of surface water for Water District 2 has not <br />changed significantly on an annual basis. However, noticeable changes <br />have occurred during certain parts of the year--porticulilrly late summer <br />and fall--indicating that the return flow pattern has been chon~ing <br />during recent years. This chan~e sLlTted in 1953 for November and Decem- <br />ber, but not until the early 1960's during the summer months. The average <br />annual depletion (inflow-outflow) for the Water District is obout 126,000 <br />acre-feet, some of which is transported to the Box Elder and Prospect <br />Valleys. <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />6. Source and extent of water utilization data. Data and estimates <br />of water used were obtained from a Farm Water Utilization Study prepared <br />by the Bureau of Reclamation for the Narrows Project. The study \'Ias for <br />the IS-year period from 1947 to 1961, inclusive. It covered 17 of the <br />canals which divert water for irrigation from the South Platte Riv9r in <br />W.ter District 2." <br /> <br />r" <br /> <br />,-~\ <br /> <br />7. Irriqated acre2qe. The Bureau estimated a total of 12~,635 <br />acres as being irrigated by the 17 canals and/or by pumping from ground- <br />wuter sources. Estimates from other 50UrCGS show considerable discrep- <br />ancy for the irrigated acreage under individual canals. <br />