Laserfiche WebLink
<br />10 <br /> <br />Only weak conclusions can be drawn from observed changes in the <br />relationship of diversions to inflows. In April and May there has been <br />an increase in diversions in relation to inflows since 1961. In the <br />remainder of the season, there has been a slight dimi.nishing of diver- <br />sions for unit inflows. The effect of irrigation practices on the area <br />and that of the different priority calls cannot be separated at this level <br />of the study, however, it may prove worth-while to do so at a later date. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In some months there is a much better regression between the two <br />variables using a parabola instead of a strai0ht line. Implications of <br />this may be significant; however, the exploration of it falls beyond the <br />scope of this study. <br /> <br />The straight line regression equations and correlation coefficients <br />are tabulated below. <br /> <br /> Correlation <br />Mon th EQua tion Coefficient <br />Apr 11 Diversions = -0.11 Inflow + 11 ,530 -0.43 <br />May Diversions = -0.05 Inflow + 33,710 -0.51 <br />June Diversions = -0.03 Inflow + 45,170 -0.24 <br />July Diversions = 0.22 Inflow + 36,130 0.67 <br />August Dl.versions = 0.28 Inflow + 29,410 0.64 <br />Sep tember Diversions = -0.06 Inflow + 29,050 -0.24 , <br />October Diversions = -0.20 Inflow + 16,450 -0.65 <br />Season Diversions = -0.04 Inflow + 184,370 0.39 <br /> , <br /> Analvsis of Historic Reservoir Contents <br /> <br />Contents of reservoirs which have storage decrees in Water Dis- <br />trict 2 and which have capacities of over 1,000 acre-feet are measured <br />and recorded by the water commissioner on the first day of each month. <br /> <br />For analysis purposes the reservoirs were divided into two groups, <br />the first includes reservoirs within the District, and the second includes <br />reservoirs owned by the Henrylyn Irrigation District located in neighbor- <br />ing Water District 1 but having points of diversion in Water District 2. <br />The available data for both groups were tabulated and also la-year moving <br />averages were tabulated and plotted on a monthly basis. <br /> <br />Reservoirs within Water District 2 <br /> <br />The average amount of water stored in Barr, Milton, Latham, and <br />Standley Reservoirs during the 32 years was 35.9 thousand acre-feet with <br />a monthly distribution of. <br /> <br />Jan <br />33 <br /> <br />Feb Mar <br />39 44 <br /> <br />Apr May <br />48 54 <br /> <br />Jun <br />53 <br /> <br />Jul <br />48 <br /> <br />Aug <br />33 <br /> <br />Sep <br />20 <br /> <br />Oct <br />14 <br /> <br />Nov Dec <br />18 27 <br /> <br />thousand acre-feet. To show the variatio~s in the amount'of water in stor- <br />age the following table gives the observed range, i.e., the span between <br />maximum and minimum for each month. <br />