My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07058
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07058
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:04:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.116.M
Description
Fruitland Mesa Project
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
3/1/1978
Author
CWCB
Title
Fruitland Mesa Project - March 1978
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />{::~~~, <br /> <br />.Releases from Milly K. Goodwin Lake would be conveyed about <br />10.6 miles by the Black Mesa Conduit to the head of the Fruitland Canal <br />near Crystal Creek. Along its course, the conduit would intercept <br />natural flows of Curecanti Creek. The Fruitland Canal would be 18.3 <br />miles long. It would distribute flows received from the Black l~sa <br />Conduit as well as flows of Crystal Creek Diversion Dam. The canal <br />would provide water to several turnouts, the six 1ar~est being to: <br />(1) Dyer Creek, a tributary of Crystal Creek, for diversion from <br />Crystal Creek downstream into the Crystal Valley Ditch for irrigation <br />of lands a10ns that stream; (2) the existing Dyer Fork Ditch for <br />irrigation of lands above Gould Reservoir; (3) the Cattleman's Ditch <br />for irrigation of presently irrigated lands below Gould Reservoir; <br />(4) turnout to provide storage water to Gould Reservoir; (5) Castle <br />Canyon, a natural channel which would convey water directly to the <br />existing Gould Canal; and (6) Poison Springs, a natural channel that <br />would carry flows to the lands between the Gould Canal and Poison <br />Springs draw. Minor turnouts from the canal would be made directly to <br />project lands and to distribution laterals. Sections of the Gould <br />Canal west of Castle Canyon would be enlarged by the owners. Two <br />siphons in the canal have already been replaced by the Bureau of Recla- <br />mation under a construction contract. <br /> <br />Operation of the existing Gould Reservoir would be integrated in <br />project operation. Project water as well as present supplies would be <br />released from the reservoir to the existing Gould Canal and several <br />small existing ditches. <br /> <br />Laterals would be constructed to distribute water from Fruitland <br />Canal to full service lands. Land drains would be constructed wherever <br />the need for them is demonstrated in project operations. <br /> <br />Fishery pools would be maintained in both Milly K. Goodwin Lake <br />and Gould Reservoir. Minimum fishery flows would be maintained in <br />Soap and Curecanti Creeks. Recreational facilities would be provided <br />and operated by the Forest Service at Milly K. Goodwin Lake and in <br />Little Soap Park. <br /> <br />A pipeline would be constructed by the National Park Service to <br />convey a small amount of project water from the Fruitland Canal for <br />public use at the Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument. Water <br />would be provided to the Bureau of Land Management at the terminus of <br />the Gould Canal for livestock and wildlife use in the Black Ridge area <br />on lower Fruitland Mesa. Conveyance of this water would be the respon- <br />sibility of BLM. <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.