My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07047
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:04:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8143.600.30A
Description
John Martin Reservoir - Other Studies
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1938
Title
Caddoa Reservoir Study - Summary of Assumed Operation No 2
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-17- <br /> <br />-.-...--.-..... <br /> <br />---- - - - ------ <br />average unit prices for the period, was ~1;148,660,-or-about-~Z;700~000-lesB~-- <br /> <br />.., <br />1". <br /> <br />then in 1930, and about $2,400,000 less than in 1929, <br /> <br />Plate No. 2 shows the "measure of crop values" based on the mean acreage <br /> <br />of the principal crops for the period 1923 to 1936, inclusive, and the average <br /> <br />unit price of crops for that period, plotted against the November to October <br /> <br />diversions plus the November to October precipitation. In this graph there <br /> <br />is eliminated entirely the influence of variable acreage of the various crops. <br /> <br />The value used is an index of crop production per acre. <br /> <br />The close correlation between water supply and crop production may be <br />princiIlal crops <br />noted by this plate. If the acreage devoted to the six~was the average for <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />the Ileriod under consideration, it is estimated from this plate that the value <br /> <br />"0 <br /> <br />of additional water supply for the area is about $4.00 per acre-foot per year <br /> <br />in increased gross production of crops. <br /> <br />However, due to the character of the water supply, the acreage of high <br /> <br />priced row crops raised in the area is low. A comparison was made of the type <br /> <br />of crops raised in Bent and Prowers counties and the crops raised in Weld <br /> <br />county, The total water supply available for use in Weld county is not any <br /> <br />more per acre than it is in Bent and Prowers counties, but it is practically <br /> <br />ell controlled and subject to use when most needed. As a result, for the <br /> <br />period 1923 to 1936, inclusive, of the total acreage of principal crops in <br /> <br />Weld county, there was an average of about 28% in row crops; while for the <br /> <br />same period the average percentage of row crops in Bent oounty was about <br /> <br />6% and in Prowers. county about 7%. This is shown in the following table: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.