Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />-, <br />n .....{ <br /> CJ) <br />"~ ~ <br /> C'J <br />y~, C:.l <br />i,; <br /> (,~~~\ <br />~a <br />';~ <br />~;i <br />U <br />ji;~) <br />~ <br />I <br />r <br />5; <br />~ <br />~~J <br />~ <br />t <br />" <br />r. <br />"'. <br />t <br />I <br />j <br />[) <br />~ <br /> t <br />f <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ~. <br /> ;~ <br /> , <br /> , <br /> :~ <br /> l <br /> .,' <br /> ~' <br /> V <br /> <br />. "-~"__- -,_ "", ,._ _. ; c.'."':'. - ; <br /> <br />A check was nade of the type map in the report at various intervals <br />on the ground above M::mte Vista against randomly selected aerial <br />photos. 'Ihe napping done then is still ac=ate as related to <br />the area of cottonwood - called Trees, bosque in their report.) <br /> <br />Reliable figures on water use of cottonwoods are difficult to <br />establish. There is a wide variation in infonnation available. <br /> <br />Fran a study by the u. S. Geological Survey 1/ - Stands of 100 <br />percent crown cover of cottonwoods and willeMs in the Safford <br />Valley of Arizona along the Gila River were found to use fran <br />7.64 to 8.1 acre-feet per acre of water annually. <br /> <br />Assuming the crown cover is about 50 percent, and the use of water <br />is about 40 percent of that found in the Safford Valley, the con- <br />sunptive use of water by cottonwoods in the San Luis Valley is <br />about 38,500 a=e-feet annually. This arrounts to about 1. 54 <br />acre-feet per acre annual average consunptive use of water by <br />these cottonwood stands. <br /> <br />In a preliminmy report of water use by phreatophytes in selected <br />portions of the Rio Grande, Conejos, and San Antonio Rivers by <br />M. W. Bittinger and Clayton Enix 2/ it was estimated that dense <br />stands of phreatophytes use 23.7 a=e-inches per acre per year <br />and light stands of phreatophytes use 15.8 a=e-inches per acre. <br />The results of reducing dense stands to light stands would be <br />about eight a=e-inches per acre. For the 25,000 acres of <br />cottonwoods, the maximum savings would be about 16,500 a=e-feet <br />annually. <br /> <br />There is little validi t:y to the assunption that eliminating <br />cottonwoods, regardless of a=eage, would increase the total <br />water yield in the river, since other vegetation would naturally <br />replace any vegetation rerroved. Along the Gila River in the <br />Safford Valley of Arizona, cottonwoods and willavs were bull- <br />dozed out between 1935 and 1936. Within three or four years <br />salt cedar took over the entire river bottan and became a nore <br />serious problem. <br /> <br />Representatives of the Colorado State Forest Service and SCS <br />estimated plots to cut from zero to 7,000 board feet per acre. <br />Assuming an average of 2,500 board feet per a=e, there should <br />be a total of about 62-1/2 million board feet of usable logs, <br />over 12 inches in diameter, breast high. Because of the age <br />and size classes available, it appears that about 50 percent of <br />the volmre could be rerroved fran nost of these cottonwood stands, <br /> <br />1/ See reference 22 <br />Y See reference 16 <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br /> <br />