My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07028
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:25 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:03:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8543.400
Description
Projects in the Closed Basin Division - Reports
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
7/8/1975
Title
Closed Basin Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Following completion of this study a more vigorous analysis was =ade by <br /> <br /> <br />aimulating the area with a digital model. Two alternate plans of ground <br /> <br />water withdrawals were considered. The first plan withdrew 840,000 <br /> <br />acre-feet annually from 378 wells with the northern salvage areas producins <br /> <br />more water and decreasing the pumpage in the southern areas. The pre- <br /> <br />dicted drawdowns were small in comparison with the thickness of saturated <br /> <br />deposits in the area. The second analysis withdrew the same amount of <br /> <br />water from 100 wells whose yield was designed in proportion to local <br /> <br />aquU,r tnnBm1ssivity. The studies indicated that both arrangements <br /> <br />were superior to the Bureau's layout prese"~ed in the house document, <br /> <br />hewever, the as recognized that the Bureau's original design may not be <br /> <br />the best layout and indicated that the salvage project would be de"eloped <br />in s,tages and that the original well Layout should be as fiUd con.litiona <br /> <br />dictated. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Results from additional model testing in 1971. in which four cases of <br /> <br />project operatioll were tested, indicated (1) that: the project prop,)ul <br />1& feasible w1th water salvage. (2) that the river will not be sigaH1- <br /> <br />caDtly d-eplete4 by withdrawals frO'll1 wells, (3) that more water can be <br /> <br />salVaged by using larger weI1fields, and (4) that the well fields <br />should be designed with withdrawals made proportional to local trans- <br /> <br />mi,.ivity. The di&ital studies esseotialJy confirmed the anal~g studies. <br /> <br />1he_IIt,",~l considered four pUlllping arrang:- 'nes with varying stresses <br /> <br />being ~~=ulated. In case 4 the well fie:j was redesigned 60 that well <br /> <br />d1s~T~e rat.. were proportional to the a~ulfer t:ran6~issivity 1n the <br /> <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />r,{'j,'1'}L" <br />'-. .I."..'V ... <br /> <br />~~_'-c' . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.