My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07016
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:22 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:03:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.800
Description
Dirty Devil Unit - Colorado River Salinity Control Program
State
UT
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
5/1/1987
Title
Planning Report and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />SUMMARY (Continued) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Problems and Needs <br /> <br />At its headwaters in the mountains of north-central Colorado, the <br />Colorado River has a salinity concentration of 50 milligrams per liter <br />(mg/L). The concentration progressively increases downstream because of <br />water diversions and salt contributions from a variety of sources. In <br />1985, salinity averaged 607 mg/L at Imperial Dam, the last major diver- <br />sion point in the United States. Without any control measures and in <br />combination with future development in the Colorado River Basin, Recla- <br />mation estimates the concentration will increase, reaching levels of <br />963 mg/L at Imperial Dam by the year 2010. In response to the Federal <br />Water Pollution Control Act and its amendments, the seven Colorado River <br />Basin States adopted and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) <br />approved numeric criteria for three locations on the Colorado River, as <br />listed in the table below. The goal of the salinity control program is <br />to maintain concentrations at or below these criteria. <br /> <br />Numeric <br />on the <br /> <br />criteria for salinity <br />lower Colorado River <br />Annual <br />flow-weighted <br />concentration <br />(mg/L) <br />723 <br />747 <br />879 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Station <br />Below Hoover Dam <br />Below Parker Dam <br />At Imperial Dam <br /> <br />The Dirty Devil River Basin contributes about 150,000 tons of salt <br />annually to the Colorado River System. The Dirty Devil River is formed <br />by the confluence of the Fremont River and Muddy Creek and flows gener- <br />ally in a southerly direct ion to the upper arm of Lake Powell. The <br />river drains a total of approximately 4,300 square miles. For the water <br />years 1977 through 1980, an annual average of approximately 150,000 tons <br />of salt and 75,000 acre-feet of surface water, as measured at Poison <br />Springs, left the Dirty Devil River Basin. As shown in the figure on <br />the following page, the Muddy Creek tributary contributes an annual <br />average of 86,000 tons of salt transported by 25,000 acre-feet of water. <br />The Fremont River tributary annually contributes 51,000 tons of salt <br />transported by 47,000 acre-feet of water. Below the confluence of the <br />Fremont River and Muddy Creek, small springs and surface runoff contrib- <br />ute an estimated 13,000 tons in 3,000 acre-feet of water. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Sources of salt in the Fremont River are primarily from natural sur- <br />face runoff and irrigation return flow. A few small springs'contribute <br />insignificant quantities. The waters from these sources are all low in <br />concentrations of total dissolved solids. Sources of salt in Muddy Creek, <br />mainly derived from the dissolution of salt from geologic formations, are <br />irrigation and coal mine return flows near Emery, natural surface runoff, <br />and saline springs primarily in Emery South Salt Wash and Hanksville Salt <br />Wash. Unit studies focused on Muddy Creek and its tributaries because of <br />the large salt load and small water volume, indicating salinity control <br />may be accomplished more economically here than on the Fremont River. <br /> <br />002310 <br /> <br />S-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.