Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, ' <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />,Effect of Limited Irrig4llbn <br />on Yield of Sugar Beets <br />Pa ge 9 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Table VI <br />J i ; ~ . I <br /> <br />SUGAR BEET IRRIGATION WATER STRESS TEST.DEMONSTRATION PROJECT <br />I ! Summary of Production Cost & Returns for 1980 Compared to <br />Potential for 1981 <br /> <br /> Est. 1981 <br /> Retu rn Est. Return! <br /> Break 1980 Over Cost! Prod. Break Acre @ <br />Water 1980 Est. Prod. Even Return! Acre Inch Cost. Even $30.00 Loss <br />Treatment Yield Co.t5 1980 Price{T @ $44.50 Irr19. Water 1981 Price! T Per Ton Per Acre <br />Full !rd. 18.65 Ton $004.33 $32.40 $829.92 $11.67 $665 $35.66 $559.50 $105.50 <br />Mod. Stre"s 16.36 604.33 36.94 728.02 36.25 665 40.64 490.80 174.20 <br />Hvy. StIll:':' 14.l'b {,U4.33 42.42 634.12 3.13 665 46,67 427.50 237.50 <br />Dryland 6.23 492.00 78.97 277.23 541 86.84 186.90 354.10 <br /> <br />The data recorded in Table VI does provide some basis for evaluation. The 1980 <br />price for' delivered beets averaged $44.50 in the test's production area. At <br />that market value, all three irrigation regimes would have yielded the farmer <br />a profit for his time and investment. Thedryland beets would result in a <br />substantial loss. <br /> <br />The added yield per added acre inch of water was greatest at $36.25 for the water <br />added as the farmer moved from two irrigations (heavy stress) to three irrigations <br />(moderate stress). The value added as the farmers moves from three irrigations <br />to a fully irrigated regime returned a creditable $11.67 per acre inch of <br />added water. All computations point to full irrigation as the most prOfitable <br />for the farmer and the economy of the area. <br /> <br />'I tile 1980 yield data as a basis for evaluating returns under 1981's <br />e~()nolllic conditions provides further information of interest. Cost of production <br />is calculated at 110% of the 1980 costs. The estimated price of delivered <br />beets at $30 per ton reflects the best optimistic price available at this time. <br />All irrigation regimes would pay the estimated $390.50 variable cost of production. <br />The full irrigation practice would result in the least financial loss. <br /> <br />01 SCUSSION <br /> <br />In this discussion, irrigation costs were figured at a constant value. The <br />writer recognizes ,the costs would vary for different systems and different <br />levels of water delivery costs. Further, the writer also recognizes that <br />conclusive results cannot be drawn from one year's data. For that reason, <br />the project is structured for five years. The 1981 test has been complicated <br />by a destructive h~il. <br /> <br />The test does, hO~E,ver, illustrate the need for i rrigat ion water in the product ion <br />of sugar beets under Colorado's high plains environment. It also illustrates <br />the yield and doll!a.r value added as the level of irrigation .water is increased. <br />