Laserfiche WebLink
<br />IJ'" <br />~ <br />C <br />- <br /> <br />': <br /> <br />Study Area <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />The Study Area covers about 1.100 square miles in Eagle County and is approximately 100 <br />miles west of Denver, as shown on Plate 1. The area includes the basin of the Eagle River to its <br />confluence with the Colorado River near Dotsero. and the basin of the Piney River to its confl~ence <br />with the Colorado River near State Bridge, as shown on Plate 2. <br /> <br />The drainage area of the Eagle River above its confluence with the Colorado River is <br />approximately 950 square miles. The Piney River basin includes an area of about 123 square <br />miles. For comparison, the drainage area of the Colorado River above State Bridge is <br />approximately 2,670 square miles. <br /> <br />Elevations in the Study Area range from under 7.000 feet, where the Eagle River meets the <br />Colorado River, to over 13.000 feet in the high peak area of the Gore Range at its eastern edge. <br />The most prominent topographic and scenic features are the high mountains of Vail Pass and the <br />Gore Range in the eastern section of the area. This part is characterized by mountain ranges and <br />alpine and subalpine vegetation. while the western lower region varies from desert.type to <br />subalpine vegetation. <br /> <br />Highway transportation in the east-west direction is provided by Interstate Highway 70, <br />which is partially completed. and by U.S. Highway 6. The interstate route. especially with the recent <br />completion of the Eisenhower Tunnel under the Continental Divide, provides convenient access <br />to the Study Area from Denver. <br /> <br />Study Objectives and Methodology <br /> <br />In recognition of the complexity of a water resources project of this magnitude. the Denver <br />Board of Water Commissioners determined the need for an independent comprehensive <br />evaluation of the Eagle and Piney River basins. This evaluation included definition of the geologic <br />and topographic features. determination of the quantity of water that could be produced efficiently <br />and responsibly by the Board from its appropriations, and assessment of the general <br />environmental impacts that might be expected from such a program. <br /> <br />The objective of this comprehensive evaluation was to identify and recommend an <br />operational configuration that would provide the maximum reliable water supply. considering <br />appropriately the economic and environmental factors. To meet this objective. a study program. <br />structured to have the flexibility to respond to the evolving results of the study activities, was <br />developed in cooperation with the Department's staff. Assumptions used for basic guidance, such <br />as those describing water use, were also developed jointly. Cooperation and coordination with the <br />staff was on a close and continuing basis. <br /> <br />The approach to estimating the streamflows available in the Study Area consisted of two <br />key phases. The first was to estimate the quantity of virgin, or undepleted. flows occurring in the <br />two basins by applying historic streamflow data extended by using statistical procedures. The <br />second was to estimate the water available to the Board's appropriations by superimposing <br />present and certain potential future water demand on the undepleted flows. The results for both <br />of these phases were achieved by the use of sophisticated analytical tools, computer technology <br />and assistance from acknowledged experts in the fields of water use and statistical hydrology. <br /> <br />Because of the rugged and remote nature of the Study Area, the topographic features and <br />structural geology were defined using airborne remote sensing techniques. Topographic maps and <br />surficial geologic information appropriate for this level of study were developed efficiently and <br />economically by this method. Limited subsurface geological investigations were conducted at <br /> <br />3 <br />