Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The project area Is located in Zona 1 of the Seismic Zone Map of the United States in the <br />1988 publication "Advanced Dam Engineering." Zone 1 Is defined as an area which may <br />experience minor earthquake damage and has an assigned seismic coefficient of 0.05. For <br />seismic stability analysis, a peak horizontal acceleration of 0.10 was chosen to allow for <br />uncertainties. <br /> <br />5.3.2 INVESTIGATIONS <br /> <br />5.3.2.1 Field Investigations <br /> <br />Field Investigations for the feaslbiltty study were conducted by WCC between October 23 <br />and 25, 1989. This work involved drilling fIVe test holes from the crest of the embankment. <br />Piezometers were Installed the five test holes. The location of these test holes Is shown on <br />Figure 1, and summary logs are shown on Figure 2. <br /> <br />WCC also conducted field investigations for the reconstruction of the dam In 1965. This <br />work involved drilling 9 test holes near the embankment and excavating 12 test pits in the <br />reservoir area. The approximate location of these test holes and test pits are also shown <br />on Figure 1. Summary logs of these test holes are shown on Figure 3 and summary logs <br />of the test pits are shown on Figure 4. <br /> <br />WCC supervised the drilling and sampling operations. The test holes were drilled by Drilling <br />Engineers, Inc. under subcontract 10 wee. The test holes were drilled using 3.75-inch I.D. <br />hollow stem augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-55 drill rig. In all fIVe test holes, a <br />field-slotted, glued-Joint PVC stand pipe was inserted into the hollow stem auger. The <br />annulus between the stand pipe and the test hole wall was filled wtth silica filter sand as <br />the hollow stem augers were removed. <br /> <br />Test holes were generally sampled at 5-foot Intervals. Samples were obtained using either <br />a two-inch 0.0. standard spltt-spoon sampler or a two-inch I.D. Cal~ornia sampler driven by <br />a 14O-pound hammer failing 30 inches. The penetration resistance of the sampler (blow <br />count) was recorded in blows per 12 inches or less. Cal~ornia samples were retained in <br />2-inch diameter by 4-lnch long brass lubes sealed with plastic caps after removal from the <br />sampler. When recovery problems were encountered wtth the Cal~ornia sampler, the split- <br />spoon sampler was used. Split-spoon samples were saved by placing them in brass tubes <br /> <br />5-9 <br />