Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.....-j <br />C\1 <br />r-- <br /> <br />1"- <br />-' <br /> <br />r-- <br />'-' <br />C) <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />A nontechnical summary of several research activities in <br />the Grand Valley is given. Analyses: of alternative measures <br />of reducing the salt load originating from the Valley as a <br />result of irrigation return flows are present'3d. These alter- <br />natives include conveyance channel linings, field relief <br />drainage, on-farm improvements (such as irrigation scheduling, <br />head ditch linings, sprinkler and trickle irrigation), economic <br />control measures such as taxation and land retirement, modified <br />legal constraints, and collection and treatment of return flows <br />with desalting systems. <br /> <br />The best management practices for salinit~ control in the <br />Grand Valley should be primarily the structurell rehabilitation <br />and operational modification of the local irrigation system <br />lying below the turnouts from the major canal systems. Canal <br />linings appear in the optimal strategies at higher levels of <br />valley-wide salinity control emphasis but only so far as lining <br />the Government Highline Canal is concerned. Desalting would <br />become a cost-effective alternative after major irrigation <br />system improvements are implemented. <br /> <br />Field drainage, taxation, and land retirement are not <br />considered reliable control alternatives because of cost and <br />marginal effectiveness. The legal measures are unlikely candi- <br />dates in a salinity control program directly, but will play an <br />important role in implementing the practices which reduce salt <br />loading directly. <br /> <br />This report was submitted in fulfillment of Grant No. <br />S-802985 to Colorado State University, under sponsorship of the <br />Environmental Protection Agency. This report covers the period <br />February 18, 1974 to June 17, 1977, and was completed as of <br />January 31, 1978. <br /> <br />vi <br />