Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Preface <br /> <br />The decline of {he native Colorado River fish fauna is a biological indicator of dramatic environmental change <br />and the potential loss of a unique natural resource. This decline is associated with human population expansion <br />and associated water development in the West, limited interest in nongame fish biology, and a lack of a conservation <br />ethic for fishes of western deserts. For these and other reasons, management and recovery options have been <br />difficult to develop for rare fishes in the Colorado River basin. Only recently have substantive life cycle and habitat <br />use information of these fishes become available and their requirement for large and diverse habitats been <br />recognized. <br />Flow and nonflow management measures for the rare Colorado River fishes are currently being developed based <br />On provisions inherent in Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. Since passage of that Act in 1973, the <br />proliferation of literature and symposia concerning recovery ofthe Colorado River fishes reflects the keen interest <br />in their management and recovery. <br />Major conflicts between various water development groups, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and others <br />regarding the cumulative effects of water development projects On recovery of the rare fishes led to the formation <br />of thc multiagency Upper Colorado River Basin Coordinating Committee in 1984. Active participants include the <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U,S. Bureau of Reclamation; Stales of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming; private watcr <br />developmenl interests; and environmental groups. Cooperation of these diverse interests demonstrates the <br />complexity involved in recovery of the rare Colorado River fishes. <br />In 1987 the Upper Colorado River Basin Coordinating Committee produced a Recovery Implementalion <br />Program for recovering the rare fishes of the upper Colorado River basin. The ultimate goal of this program was <br />to rccover and dclist the Colorado squawfish (Prye/rochei/lls IIICillS), humpback chub (Gila cypha), and bonytail <br />chub (G. elegalls). In addition, management options woula be developed for the razorback sucker (Xyrallchell <br />texalllls) so that protcction under the Endangered Spccies Act would not be needed. <br />Onc clement oflhe Recovery Implementation Program is the protection of streamflow needs of the listed fishcs. <br />In mceting this goal, the Yampa River has bccn assigned highest-priority for waler rights acquisition. As the only <br />large rivcr in thc uppcr Colorado Rivcr basin in which now patterns have not been substantially altered by watcr <br />development projects, the Yampa River is considered imporcant for the maintenance and recovery of existing <br />populalions of rare Colorado River fishes. <br />In 1988, the Upper Colorado River Basin Coordinating Committee requested that streamnow requirements of <br />the rare fishes in the Yampa River be quantified to aid water acquisition in line with the goals of the Rccovery <br />Implementation Program. A two-step process was subsequently outlined: (1) evaluation of habitat use, potential <br />limiting factors, and general flow needs (i.e., relation between life cycle and annual flow events) of the four nsh <br />species; and (2) quantincation of the identified needs with respect to quantity, duration, and timing of flows. The <br />prescnt report fulnlls step I: it is an evaluation of habitat use and streamflow requirements of the Colorado <br />squawfish, humpback chub, bonytail chub, and razorback sucker in the Yampa River. <br />Questions regarding technical matcrial in this report may be addressed 10 the authors. Additional information <br />regarding the Recovery Implementation Program may be obtained from Colorado River Coordinator (FWE), U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service, P,O. Box 25486, Denver Federal Center, Denver. Colorado 80225, <br /> <br />IV <br /> <br />..,..------ <br />