<br />000575
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />River
<br />Preservation
<br />and Recreation
<br />Programs:
<br />
<br />A Status Report
<br />
<br />(This article is adapted from a paper
<br />presented by Robert L. Eastman,
<br />Chief, Division of Resource Area
<br />Studies, Bureau of Outdoor Recrea-
<br />tion, at a national symposium,
<br />"River Recreation Management arid
<br />Research," January 24-27, 1977, at
<br />Minneapolis, Minn.)
<br />
<br />Background
<br />Of the more than three million
<br />miles of rivers and tributaries in the
<br />United States pouring their waters
<br />down to the sea, many have been
<br />harnessed lor flood control, naviga-
<br />tion, hydroelectric power, municipal
<br />and industrial water supply, and irri-
<br />gation. Cities, factories ar1d homes
<br />have been buiit on their fiood piains.
<br />Their banks have been dumping
<br />grounds for waste materials and
<br />their waters the recipient of indus-
<br />trial and municipal wastes. In many
<br />ways, the beauty and purity of these
<br />streams have been mindlessly de-
<br />stroyed. An affluent society has
<br />become an effluent society. It has
<br />degraded drinking water and de-
<br />stroyed the values of fish, wildlife
<br />and scenic and recreation re-
<br />sources.
<br />The need to preserve portions of
<br />a national heritage;s not new. How-
<br />ever, there is no need to recite
<br />history except as it relates directly
<br />to the efforts to establish a system
<br />to protect wild and scenic rtvers.
<br />In 1961, the Senate Select Com-
<br />mitlee on National Water Resources
<br />recommended:
<br />
<br />That certain streams be preserved
<br />in lheir free-flowing condition be-
<br />cause their natural scenic, scien-
<br />tific, and esthetic and recreational
<br />values outweigh their value for
<br />
<br />2
<br />
<br />water development and control pur-
<br />poses now and in the future.
<br />This recommendation was rein-
<br />forced by the Outdoor Recreation
<br />Resources Review Commission
<br />when it concluded in its final report
<br />in January 1962 that: "Certain riv-
<br />ers should be preserved in their
<br />free-flowing condition and natural
<br />setting." Because of the unique
<br />scenic and recreational values that
<br />certain rivers provide, the Commis-
<br />sion endorsed efforts to preserve
<br />them in their natural condition. To
<br />accomplish this objective, it recom-
<br />mended that studies be made to
<br />identify rivers or river segments
<br />having these values.
<br />In 1962, the Secretaries of the
<br />Interior and Agriculture directed a
<br />joint effort by the two departmenls
<br />to set up a national system of free-
<br />flowing rivers. A wild rivers stUdy
<br />committee was selected to formu-
<br />late a procedure for setting up the
<br />system. All of the States were con-
<br />tacted and with their assistance,
<br />some 650 rivers that seemed to be
<br />worthy of consideration were listed.
<br />Field study teams were organized
<br />with representatives of Federal
<br />agencies and the States. The teams
<br />culled Ihe list down to 67 rivers.
<br />A reconnaissance was then made
<br />of these 67 to determine their suita-
<br />bility for possible Federal designa-
<br />tion. On the basis of this recon-
<br />naissance, a more detailed stUdy
<br />was conducted on 22 rivers which
<br />appeared to deserve some type of
<br />protection or preservation in a fres-
<br />flowing condition. Legislation to ac-
<br />complish this objective was drafted
<br />and submitted to the Congress,
<br />
<br />Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
<br />In October 1968, after some 6
<br />years of discussion and debate, the
<br />Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, PL
<br />90-542, became law. The act estab-
<br />lished the basic principle that cer-
<br />tain selected rivers of 1he Nation
<br />which, with their immediate environ-
<br />ments, possess outstandingly re-
<br />markable scenic, recreational, geo-
<br />logic, lish and wildiile, historic,
<br />cultural, or other similar values, are
<br />
<br />While cliffs are typical landscape along
<br />the Upper Missouri River in Montana.
<br />
<br />to be preserved in a free-flowing
<br />condition and protected for the
<br />benefit and enjoyment of present
<br />and future generations.
<br />The clear intent of Congress in
<br />the act was 10 establish a system
<br />of areas distinct from the traditional
<br />concept of a National Park. Rather
<br />than acquiring a massive land area,
<br />the Federal agency managing a
<br />component of the National System
<br />is to acquire only a narrow strip
<br />of land sufficient to insure protec-
<br />tion of the river environment. Fee
<br />acquisition of lands is limited to
<br />an average of no more than 100
<br />acres per river mile, and the power
<br />of eminent domain is suspended
<br />when fee title to 50 percent of the
<br />authorized area is in publiC owner-
<br />ship. Additionally, scenic ease-
<br />ments may be acquired in sufficient
<br />amount to make the total acquisi-
<br />tion not more than an average of
<br />320 acres per mile. (This is equiva-
<br />lent to a river corridor averaging
<br />one-hail miie wide.) The effect is
<br />to permit continued agricultural and
<br />residential use near rivers in the
<br />system, but to preclude heavy de-
<br />velopment which would impair the
<br />character of the river involved.
<br />The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
<br />established the National Wild and
<br />Scenic Rivers System composed of
<br />eight initial rivers and identified 27
<br />other rivers to be studied for pos-
<br />sible inclusion in the National
<br />System.
<br />The act further encourages the
<br />inclusion of State rivers in the sys-
<br />tem by providing that upon request
<br />of the Governor of a State, rivers
<br />which have been designated by Ihe
<br />State legislature as wild, scenic. or
<br />recrealional river areas and which
<br />meet the criteria set forth by the
<br />Congress and supplemental cri-
<br />teria developed by the Secretary of
<br />the Interior, may be protected as
<br />part of the National System. In ad-
<br />dition, fhe act authorized the Secre-
<br />tary to provide technical assistance,
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />
<br />i
<br />
<br />I
<br />
|