Laserfiche WebLink
<br />000575 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />River <br />Preservation <br />and Recreation <br />Programs: <br /> <br />A Status Report <br /> <br />(This article is adapted from a paper <br />presented by Robert L. Eastman, <br />Chief, Division of Resource Area <br />Studies, Bureau of Outdoor Recrea- <br />tion, at a national symposium, <br />"River Recreation Management arid <br />Research," January 24-27, 1977, at <br />Minneapolis, Minn.) <br /> <br />Background <br />Of the more than three million <br />miles of rivers and tributaries in the <br />United States pouring their waters <br />down to the sea, many have been <br />harnessed lor flood control, naviga- <br />tion, hydroelectric power, municipal <br />and industrial water supply, and irri- <br />gation. Cities, factories ar1d homes <br />have been buiit on their fiood piains. <br />Their banks have been dumping <br />grounds for waste materials and <br />their waters the recipient of indus- <br />trial and municipal wastes. In many <br />ways, the beauty and purity of these <br />streams have been mindlessly de- <br />stroyed. An affluent society has <br />become an effluent society. It has <br />degraded drinking water and de- <br />stroyed the values of fish, wildlife <br />and scenic and recreation re- <br />sources. <br />The need to preserve portions of <br />a national heritage;s not new. How- <br />ever, there is no need to recite <br />history except as it relates directly <br />to the efforts to establish a system <br />to protect wild and scenic rtvers. <br />In 1961, the Senate Select Com- <br />mitlee on National Water Resources <br />recommended: <br /> <br />That certain streams be preserved <br />in lheir free-flowing condition be- <br />cause their natural scenic, scien- <br />tific, and esthetic and recreational <br />values outweigh their value for <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />water development and control pur- <br />poses now and in the future. <br />This recommendation was rein- <br />forced by the Outdoor Recreation <br />Resources Review Commission <br />when it concluded in its final report <br />in January 1962 that: "Certain riv- <br />ers should be preserved in their <br />free-flowing condition and natural <br />setting." Because of the unique <br />scenic and recreational values that <br />certain rivers provide, the Commis- <br />sion endorsed efforts to preserve <br />them in their natural condition. To <br />accomplish this objective, it recom- <br />mended that studies be made to <br />identify rivers or river segments <br />having these values. <br />In 1962, the Secretaries of the <br />Interior and Agriculture directed a <br />joint effort by the two departmenls <br />to set up a national system of free- <br />flowing rivers. A wild rivers stUdy <br />committee was selected to formu- <br />late a procedure for setting up the <br />system. All of the States were con- <br />tacted and with their assistance, <br />some 650 rivers that seemed to be <br />worthy of consideration were listed. <br />Field study teams were organized <br />with representatives of Federal <br />agencies and the States. The teams <br />culled Ihe list down to 67 rivers. <br />A reconnaissance was then made <br />of these 67 to determine their suita- <br />bility for possible Federal designa- <br />tion. On the basis of this recon- <br />naissance, a more detailed stUdy <br />was conducted on 22 rivers which <br />appeared to deserve some type of <br />protection or preservation in a fres- <br />flowing condition. Legislation to ac- <br />complish this objective was drafted <br />and submitted to the Congress, <br /> <br />Wild and Scenic Rivers Act <br />In October 1968, after some 6 <br />years of discussion and debate, the <br />Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, PL <br />90-542, became law. The act estab- <br />lished the basic principle that cer- <br />tain selected rivers of 1he Nation <br />which, with their immediate environ- <br />ments, possess outstandingly re- <br />markable scenic, recreational, geo- <br />logic, lish and wildiile, historic, <br />cultural, or other similar values, are <br /> <br />While cliffs are typical landscape along <br />the Upper Missouri River in Montana. <br /> <br />to be preserved in a free-flowing <br />condition and protected for the <br />benefit and enjoyment of present <br />and future generations. <br />The clear intent of Congress in <br />the act was 10 establish a system <br />of areas distinct from the traditional <br />concept of a National Park. Rather <br />than acquiring a massive land area, <br />the Federal agency managing a <br />component of the National System <br />is to acquire only a narrow strip <br />of land sufficient to insure protec- <br />tion of the river environment. Fee <br />acquisition of lands is limited to <br />an average of no more than 100 <br />acres per river mile, and the power <br />of eminent domain is suspended <br />when fee title to 50 percent of the <br />authorized area is in publiC owner- <br />ship. Additionally, scenic ease- <br />ments may be acquired in sufficient <br />amount to make the total acquisi- <br />tion not more than an average of <br />320 acres per mile. (This is equiva- <br />lent to a river corridor averaging <br />one-hail miie wide.) The effect is <br />to permit continued agricultural and <br />residential use near rivers in the <br />system, but to preclude heavy de- <br />velopment which would impair the <br />character of the river involved. <br />The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act <br />established the National Wild and <br />Scenic Rivers System composed of <br />eight initial rivers and identified 27 <br />other rivers to be studied for pos- <br />sible inclusion in the National <br />System. <br />The act further encourages the <br />inclusion of State rivers in the sys- <br />tem by providing that upon request <br />of the Governor of a State, rivers <br />which have been designated by Ihe <br />State legislature as wild, scenic. or <br />recrealional river areas and which <br />meet the criteria set forth by the <br />Congress and supplemental cri- <br />teria developed by the Secretary of <br />the Interior, may be protected as <br />part of the National System. In ad- <br />dition, fhe act authorized the Secre- <br />tary to provide technical assistance, <br /> <br />" <br /> <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />I <br />