Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:;\~ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />w <br />Ul <br />c.o <br />01 <br /> <br />I, THE COLORADO RIVER SALINITY PROBLEM WITH MEXICO 1/ <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />History <br /> <br />The 1~44 United States-Mexico Treaty for Utilization of Waters of the <br />Co10r~do and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande allots to Mexico a <br />guaranteed annual quantity of 1,500,000 acrefeet "of the waters of the <br />Co 1 orado Ri ver, from any and all sources..." and " whatever thei r <br />origin... " <br /> <br /> <br />MexicQ and the United States have had differing interpretations of these <br />and related treaty provisions as they may affect water quality, These <br />questions relating to quality did not become a practical issue until <br />1961, 'partly because until then Mexico had received excess Colorado <br />River ,flows. These excess flows diluted more saline return flows with <br />the result that the quality of the water delivered to Mexico was very <br />nearly the same as that used in the lower Colorado River Basin of the <br />United States. <br /> <br />Howev~r, in 1961 two events occurred to make quality a serious issue. <br />Pumping of highly saline drainage from the We11ton-Mohawk District began <br />at abqut the same time that availability of excess waters came virtuaJ1y <br />to an ,end. The effect of these two events was to increase the average <br />annua~ salinity of waters made available to Mexico in the Colorado River <br />aboveiits main diversion structure from an annual average of about 80b <br />parts per mill ion to nearly 1,500 parts per mill ion. <br /> <br />In Nov;ember 1961, Mexico formally protested that "the delivery of water <br />that i's harmful for the purposes stated in the Trei)ty constitutes a <br />vio1adion of the Treaty," and that "any contamination of internationaJ <br />wateribyone of the riparian countries that causes damage or loss to the <br />other (riparian party is in itself an act clearly and specifically con- <br />demned by International Law,.." 2/ Concerned over the effects of high <br />salinttyon the farms of the Mexicali Valley, Mexico has continued to <br />press 'its case. <br /> <br />In response to Mexican protests, a series of interim measures have been <br />taken is i nee 1961 and the water deli vered to Mexi co has never agai n <br />reache:d the peak salinity of that year, <br /> <br />As a result of several studies, the two Governments, in 1965, reached a <br />five-year agreement embodied in Minute No, 218 of the International <br />Boundary and Water Commission. <br /> <br />Pursuant to this Minute, the United States engaged in selective pumping <br />of th~ We11ton-Mohawk drainage wells to alleviate salinity at the times <br /> <br /> <br />1/ E)(;tracts from the 1972 report of Special Representative Herbert Brownell. <br />~ Note, Embassy of Mexico, No, 4012, November 9, 1961. <br />