Laserfiche WebLink
<br />w <br />O"J <br />;.-, <br /><:) <br /> <br />c. Yuma Desalting Test Facility <br /> <br />In 1974, desalting membrane manufacturers were invited to bring test units <br />to the facil ity at no cost to the Government. The Government was to provide, <br />acceptable pretreated drainwater, since raw drainwater is not suitable for <br />use directly in desalting equipment, Initially, seven manufacturers <br />responded. Other manufacturers later expressed interest, and two,were put <br />on line in late 1975. All testing of these units was terminated in <br />May 1978 after equipment selection was made, <br /> <br />Major ,objectives of the test program are: <br /> <br />1:. To provide the Bureau of Reclamation and desalting equipment <br />~anufacturers data on desalting modules and equipment operating on <br />pretreated drainwater, <br /> <br />~. ,To allow desalting equipment manufacturers to gain confidence in <br />their equipment for operating on the pretreated water. <br /> <br />3., To provide, in part, information for evaluation of desalting <br />aquipment proposed for the Yuma Desalting Plant. <br /> <br />4. To test pretreatment systems and to optimize pretreatment system <br />pa rameters. <br /> <br />The ov~rriding constraint on the testing was that it was for the benefit of <br />the Yuma Desalting Plant and, thus, units which are clearly inappropriate <br />were not tested, Since termination of the membrane unit testing, efforts <br />at the'test facility have centered on obtaining final design data for the <br />pretre~tment system, This work is scheduled to be completed just prior to <br />initiation of proof testing on the selected desalting units. This test <br />of 6 m9nth's duration is to demonstrate, using equipment the same as that <br />offered, the performance characteristics proposed by the manufacturer, <br />All work is programed to be completed by early 1980. <br /> <br />O. <br /> <br />Optimization (Preliminary Engineering Report) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />.1 <br />0:; <br /> <br />:t <br /> <br />. <br />It is Intended that the desalting plant operate as near optimum as possible, 1 <br />under systematic regulation of the variables affecting such operation, <br />Economic considerations and, in this case, the associated legal commitments, <br />serve as a basis for plant optimization, <br /> <br />In the "Preliminary Engineering Analysis," by Burns and Roe, Inc., under <br />contract to, the Office of Water Research and Technology, a base case <br />design.was developed for a plant split among electrodialysis, hollow fine <br />fiber ~everse osmosis, and spiral wound reverse osmosis processes, This <br />"P1ant:sp1it" served to: (1) establish guidelines for the development of <br />bid paqkages; (2) provide a basis for evaluation of those bids; (3) identify <br />relationships among the different processes; (4) establish a technically <br />feasib1,e plant design that would accommodate the required detail of each <br />possibl:e offering: and (5) provide the maximum amount of information on the <br />design 'of large membrane plants. <br /> <br />The OPtimization determined the membrane life, or replacement period, which <br />resulted in the lowest salt removal cost, The parameters considered were <br />pumpinQ cost, membrane ownership cost, mechanical equipment ownership cost, <br />plant structures ownership cost, pretreatment cost, operation and mainte- ' <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />'~ <br /> <br />"'i. <br /> <br />, <br />!~ <br /> <br />