Laserfiche WebLink
<br />It is also suspected that increased clarity of the Missouri River has affected <br />food availability by changing species composition and by making it more <br />difficult for pallid sturgeon, and other native species, to capture prey in <br />the clearer water environment. In the Missouri River, pelagic planktivores <br />and sight-feeding carnivores have increased in abundance, whereas species <br />specialized for life in the turbid, predevelopment river (like the pallid <br />sturgeon) have decreased in abundance (Pflieger and Grace 1987). This change <br />in conunun ity structure is 1 ess apparent where changes in the natural <br />hydrograph, temperature regime, and turbidity are less pronounced. <br /> <br />Flood flows were essential for the dynamic transport of sediment and the re- <br />arrangement of these sediments into natural morphological channel features <br />(fish habitat); it served to introduce and transport organic matter from the <br />floodplain; and to maintain turbidity. Flood flows were the principle method <br />for the introduction of large woody debris and carried nutrients to floodplain <br />plant communities, which determined floodplain forest composition and .. . <br />structure. Invertebratereproductjon and behavioral migration was closelY <br />tied to the natural hydrograph (Hesse and Mestl 1993c). <br /> <br />Nearly all snags were removed from the Missouri River between 1838 and 1950. <br />This, plus the cessation of flooding and meandering as a result of danuning and <br />channelizing the river has reduced the availability of organic matter.supplies <br />util ized by ihe aquatic invertebrate conununity (Hesse and MestlI993a). Snags <br />influence.sedimont routing', thus creating pools, gravel bars, and depositional <br />areas, which in'turn reduce the' rate of downstream transport of particulate <br />organic matter (Bilby and Ward 1991; Bilby and likens 1980). <br /> <br />Snags also provide habitat for aquatic insects that make up a large proportion <br />of both the.shovelnose and pallid sturgeon's diet. These insects are . <br />collector-filterer-gatherers (Merritt and Cummins 1984).. They cling to large <br />woody debris in high velocity areas, gathering drifting diatoms, algae, <br />.animals, and organic detritus. Mestl and Hesse (1993) documented a decl ine <br />in the abundance of snag insect production of more than 65 percent in <br />Nebraska's portion of the Missouri River between 1963 and 1980. <br /> <br />In spite of man's efforts to constrict and control the Missouri and <br />Mississippi Rivers with reservoirs, stabilized banks,. jetties; dikes, levees <br />andreventments that result in impacts described above, remnant reaches of the <br />Missouri River and the Mississippi River from the Missouri River confluence.to <br />the Gulf still provide habitat believed usable by pallid sturgeon. These <br />remnants described later as Recovery-Priority" Management Areas are priority <br />areas for implementation of recovery actions. <br /> <br />Commercial Harvest: Historically, pallid, shovelnose,and lake sturgeon were <br />commercially harvested on the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers (Helms 1974). <br />The larger lake and pallid sturgeon were sought for their eggs which were sold <br />as caviar, whereas shovel nose sturgeon were destroyed as a bycatch. <br />Conunercial harvest of all sturgeon has declined substantially since record <br />keeping began in the late 1800's. Most commercial catch records for sturgeon <br />have not differentiated between species. Combined harvests as high as <br />195,450 kg (430,889 lbs) were recorded in the Mississippi River in the early <br />1890's, but had declined to less than 9,100 kg (20,062 lbs) by 1950 (Carlander <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />T <br />