My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06951
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06951
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:05 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:59:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - USGS
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1985
Author
USGS
Title
Ground-Water Contribution to the Salinity of the Upper Colorado River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />m <br />00 <br />CO <br /> <br />The adjusted dissolved-solids concentration in the Colorado River below <br />Glenwood Springs (site 52) was 807 mg/L. The estimated base-flow salt load in <br />the Colorado River below G1enwood Springs was 974,000 ton/yr (fig. 8), and the' <br />base-flow discharge was 1,226 ft3/s. This estimate included adjustments ,for <br />Williams Fork, Dillon, Green Mountain, and Ruedi Reservoirs. The total <br />calculated contributions from the Colorado River upper headwaters subbasin was <br />645,000 ton/yr, and the adjusted discharge addition was 470 ft3/s. In the <br />reach between Dotsero and Glenwood Springs, the salt load of the Colorado <br />River increased by 719,000 ton/yr. The Roaring Fork River added 183,000 <br />ton/yr, and other measured tributary inflow to the Colorado River in this <br />reach added 1,500 ton/yr. The remaining 534,000 ton/yr in this reach probably <br />'originates from many hot and warm springs. If these springs are the primary <br />source of the additional salt, they contribute about one-half of the annual <br />base-flow salt load for the Upper Colorado River Basin ,above G1enwood Springs. <br />Under this assumption the combined discharge of the Dotsero-Glenwood Springs <br />hot springs group was estimated using equation 3 outlined in the "Data <br />Collection and Method of Analysis" section of this report. An estimated <br />discharge of 18 ft3/s was computed for this group of springs. <br /> <br />Salt-load distribution <br /> <br />The areal distribution of the sources of flow and estimated salt load in <br />the Colorado upper headwaters subregion indicates that the Blue River produces <br />an estimated 1 percent of the base-flow salt load and 15 percent of the <br />base-flow discharge; the Eagle River produces an estimated 14 percent of the <br />base-flow salt load and about 16 percent of the base-flow discharge; the <br />Roaring Fork River produces an estimated 19 percent of the base-flow salt load <br />and about 30 percent of the base-flow discharge; and the Dotsero-Glenwood <br />Springs hot springs produce about 55 percent of the estimated base-flow salt <br />load and an insignificant volume of flow. Combined, these sources represent <br />89 percent of the estimated base-flow salt load and 61,percent of the base- <br />flow discharge of the Colorado upper headwaters subregion. <br /> <br />The graph of salt load, dissolved-solids concentration, and discharge for <br />the main stem of the Colorado River (fig. 9) depicts the impact of these <br />various sources on salinity levels of the Colorado River. A slight increase <br />in salt load and dissolved-solids concentration in the main stem of the <br />Colorado River is apparent until its confluence with the Eagle River. The <br />most apparent impact is the large increase in salt load and dissolved-solids <br />concentration of the Colorado River downstream from the Eagle River near <br />Glenwood Springs due to the discharge of highly saline mineral springs along <br />this reach. <br /> <br />The base-flow salt loads measured at selected sites in the Colorado upper <br />headwaters subregion were compared with the total annual salt load reported by <br />BLM (Bentley and others, 1978). The estimated base-flow salt load of <br /> <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.