My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06918
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06918
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:24:55 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:58:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.A
Description
UCRBRIP Habitat Restoration
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/8/1997
Author
UCRBRIP
Title
Final Habitat Restoration Program FY 1998 Work Plan Part 1
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />G-\' <br /> <br />Although gravel pits are artificial environments that are typically <br />diked and isolated from the mainstem river. they comprise a.large <br />proportion of pond habitats created by gravel-pit mining in the <br />floodplain in some river corridors along the Upper.Colorado River. <br />Gravel mining operations along the Colorado River in the Grand Valley <br />between Palisade and Lorna, Colorado (15- and 18-mile reaches), between <br />Rifle and Debeque. Colorado, and near Delta. Colorado. on the Gunnison <br />River have created numerous gravel pits that vary in size. depth. <br />shape. and orientation to the mainstem river. <br /> <br />During high flow events. some of these ponds have been temporarily <br />connected to the river allowing access to fish. However. these ponds <br />that do not have permanent connections to the river have also trapped <br />fish following recession of high flows. Ponds that are reconnected to <br />the river are less likely to trap endangered fishes. Integrating ponds <br />created from gravel-pit mining into the historic floodplain by removing <br />portions of dikes and re-establishing connectivity to the river may <br />provide off. channel habitats which are essential for effective <br />management of the riverine ecosystem and recovery of endangered fishes. <br /> <br />Most researchers believe that connecting isolated ponds to the river <br />can be seasonally beneficial to endangered fishes. Ponds that are <br />gently graded and connected to the river should be evaluated for their <br />possible benefit for.endangered fishes by providing off-channel <br />habitats while reducing or minimizing proliferation of nonnative <br />fishes. Valdez and Wick (1983) and Osmundson and Kaeding (1991) <br />hypothesized that graded gravel pits that flood during runoff and drain <br />with descending flow may benefit adult razorback sucker and Colorado <br />squawfish by providing feeding. resting, conditioning, and possibly <br />spawning areas while minimizing the potential proliferation of <br />nonnative fishes that either compete with or predate upon endangered <br />fishes. Habitat restoration of gravel pits may provide food that <br />should increase survival of larval and juvenile endangered fishes. <br />Graded gravel pits could function as seasonal. surrogate floodplain <br />habitats for use by endangered and other native fishes. <br /> <br />Protection, restoration, and enhancement of inundated bottomland <br />habitat along mainstem riparian corridors are believed to be important <br />for recovery of razorback sucker. Before razorback sucker are <br />reintroduced into historical reaches of the Upper Colorado River, <br />reconnecting the river with bottomlands is essential. One site by <br />itself will probablY not be sufficient to establish and maintain self- <br />sustaining populations of endangered fishes. Thus. additional <br />bottomland sites will need to be identified and developed to provide a <br />series or "network" of off. channel habitats. <br /> <br />:3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.