My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06904
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06904
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:24:52 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:57:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20.B
Description
California Water Use
State
CA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
5/16/1938
Author
CWCB
Title
Protests of the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming Against Proposed Contracts Between United States and the City of Los Angeles and Metro. Water District of Southern Calif.
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3781 <br /> <br />Nathan R. !largold. <br /> <br />-4- <br /> <br />!lay 16, 1938 <br /> <br />(Section 5. Subdivision A, Parabraph 2) it VlflS provided that the contracts <br />as ~ade should bo subject to revisien of rates at the end of the first <br /> <br />fifteen-year period and at each tOll-year peried thereafter upon donand ef <br /> <br />oither party thereto, such roadjust~onts of rates to be either u~'mrd or <br /> <br />daMmvurd. The rates for falling water as spocifiod in tho contracts aro <br /> <br />1.63 mills por kilowatt hour for firm power and 0.5 mills per kilowatt <br />hour for socondary po\ror. iVhatover may have boen tho formula which pro- <br /> <br /> <br />duced the rate of 1.63 mills por kilowatt hour for firm power, it is evi- <br /> <br /> <br />dont that there ,vas no oxact formula employod to arrivo at tho rate of 0.5 <br /> <br /> <br />mills per kilowatt hour for secondary power. <br /> <br />If tho State of California or its agoncios should arguo that tho <br /> <br /> <br />prico of firm powor is too high" this would in no way impel tho conclusion <br /> <br /> <br />that tho price of socondary powur is also too high. Tho provisionsof tho <br /> <br /> <br />Bouldor Canyon Projoct Act apply as much to socondary power as"b!l firm <br /> <br />power, and if at the periods fixod for rato adjustmont, it shall appear <br />that one rato is too high and the other rate is too low, there is the <br />right, upon tho demand of either party, to have a full adjustr,wnt. This <br />right would bo complotely ~ropt avmy by tho provisions of the proposod con- <br />tracts. In tho proposed contracts it is assumed that if firm pavler rates <br /> <br />are too high thon tho socondary povror rate is too high, and such an ass~p. <br /> <br />tion, if aecepted, would deprive all interested parties of the epportuni~y <br />and right te assert te the Seeretary, or otherwiso, that the secondary <br /> <br />power was boing sold at a price below its aotual worth. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.