Laserfiche WebLink
<br />XXVllI <br /> <br />LETTEil OF TRANSMITIAL <br /> <br />necessary during the study period, indicate that fl material increase <br />in consumption of tributary milow reachmg the rIver below OtoWI <br />gaging station would be neccsslt;y to supply the irrigation require- <br />ments of the middle valJey, Such mcreased consumptlOn would <br />cOL'st.it.ute. fin additional debit to New 1\1exico because such consump- <br />tion would be caused by works constructed after 1937, <br />4, New Mexico was not charged as a debit with the nonrecoverable <br />bank storag" which would result from the operation of the reservoir:; <br />proposed in the reports of the agencies, <br />The Corps of Engineers stal.e that operation 3-RR of the propose' I <br />project. is merely for illustrative purposes and that otber types of <br />operation could be Dlllde, They suggcst one type which would rcsult <br />in substantial curry-over in the reservoirs subject to eva.cuation based <br />on the results of snow surveys. <br />On page 69, pllragmphs 165 aDd IGG of tlIe appendix C, Hydrolog,,' <br />of the Corps of Engineers' Report, the following statement is made: <br />165. OTHER OPERATION STUDIEB.-!\ljmerous other opera.tion studies have <br />be€ll made during t.he preparat.ion of thi::; suryey report.. AUholl{lh the basic cri- <br />teria, including the depletion in New Afi'-xico, hat'c been varied in many of the stl/dies, <br />it is important to note that so long a8 the terms oj the Rio Grande compacl are followed, <br />the dill/sinn of 1L:ater between Colorado, New JUexico, and Texas will- remain prac- <br />tically the 8ame for et'cry operation. For t.he IS-year period used in most of the <br />studies (HJ25 to 1942) it has becn fOllnd that Colorado wiH alwllYs get about <br />13,340,000 acre-feet of water, New Mexico will be 9,780,000 acre-feet, and the <br />Elephant Butte project will get 14,010,000 acre-feet. A cha1lge 1"11 the criteria <br />affccts only the division of water in New J.hxico betwcen bene-fidal and l10llbencficial <br />uses. 11 is impor/ant to poil/t oul that the method (If o}Jerafi(ln shown as Operatwn <br />Study No. 3-UR ~.8 not a recommended method of operation but only one possible <br />method. There are nUlnerous other methods by which the project may be oper- <br />ated and it is considered. that. 0. final method of operation must he determined after <br />the project is :l.ctun.lly in operatioll" Any final method of operation should be <br />agreed to by all intere!ited part.ie~. [Italics furnished.J <br />ltil:i. EVACUATION SCHEDUL8.-Although Operation SLudy No. 3-RR ShOWll <br />in this report does not make any attempt to show that wat.er may he retained in <br />the flood-control dams, ot.her stuoie!'. indicate that the retention of water upstream <br />in accordance wit,h predet.ermined evacuation sc:hedules is possible. Because <br />sprinl1: fllll-off may be predicted from snow surveys it is possible to maintain water <br />in Chifto and Chamita Dams in accordance with this predetermined Elcherlule. A <br />tentative schedule used in some of the wat.er studies pro\'ides that these reservoirs <br />be evacllo.ted to {.he following quantity in st.orage by December 31 of each year: <br />.-tat-fal <br />700,000 <br />500, 000 <br /> <br />ChiAQ Reservoir_ _ ____~_ _____ _ ___. _ _ __ ____ _ _ _ _ __ __ _~ _ __ _ ___. _ __ <br />Chamita Reservoir ______ __ _ ____ _ _ _ __ _ ___ __ _ ~ ~ _ _ _ __ __ _ __ _ __ ___ __ <br /> <br />TotaL _ __ _ __ __ _ _ . _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _. _ _ . _ _ __ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ __ . . _ _ __ _ 1, 200, 000 <br /> <br />Evacuations after December 31 would be based on the predicted fUn-otTo In <br />the e\.cnt of an exceptionally he3.v)' snowfall, and if the forecasts should indica.te <br />a larger than normal spring run-off, the 1,200,000 acre-feet of storage or any part <br />thereof could then be ent.irely evacuated by April 1:5, without exceeding thc safe <br />capacity of the challllcl through the developed areas. If the ::;now melt forecasts <br />indicated that the spring flood WOllIn be comparatively small in \'olume, then the <br />amot\nt of wat.er rele.'lsen from t.he resen.oirs aft.er .Tn,llU:l.n' 1 could be reduced <br />B.ccorrlirlg-Iy. By o).:xmlting Ole dam." ill this mlllJllCr t.here ",'ill be a .sa....ing in <br />water hecau~e uf the lower rate of evaporution at higher alt.itudes, there would be <br />increased benefits to fish and wildlife and to recreaLional developments, and tbe <br />retent.ion of water upstream until needcd might provide the basis for producing <br />power because t.he releases could be more uniform .9.LJd dependable o\'~r lunger <br />periods of time. <br /> <br />The firs~ two sentences which are ill italics in t.he qunt.fi.t,ion of <br /> <br />paragraph 16.5 of l.he appendix C of the report of the Corps of En- <br /> <br />gineers indicate plainly a lack of lInderstandiug of the operation of the <br /> <br />Rio GnuHlc COTIlpa.ctJ \vhich permits the passing to all up~trenm reser- <br />